Hi Stephan, you're absolutely right. That's why the committee this year has
started penalizing repeat recipients on the points scoring - if they just
got one, then they will be less likely to get one in the next year. Their
reports from past years are also evaluated, and if they did not fill them
in well, then that will cause a serious points deduction for them. See the
guide I linked to a few emails up for specifics here.
I certainly don't mean to dismiss this entire subject. There is certainly a
question of whether we should do more to prevent repeat funding. But I
think that conversation needs to be had apart from specific cases, and with
a clear focus on the institutions of selection and what actual effects any
changes would bring.
Adrian Raddatz
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Stephan Schulz <schulz(a)eprover.org> wrote:
On 20 May 2017, at 07:36, Adrian Raddatz
<ajraddatz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There is no manipulation. The idea that someone could have befriended
all of their
reviewers every year for a decade is quite silly. I'm sorry
that you didn't get a scholarship this year, but at this point there is not
a useful conversation being had here.
If you think there is a problem, volunteer for the scholarship committee
next year
and help fix it!
There is, of course, a legitimate question if each committee blindly
choses from
the current pool of applicant without looking into history, or if there is
some
institutional memory that will ensure a wider spread of accepted
applications.
In the first case, it is not unlikely that someone who wrote a good
application once
and who otherwise fits the criteria will have a good chance one year later.
In the second case, one could give bonus points for first-time applicants,
or forbid
application immediately after one success, or have an arbitrarily complex
system of
awarding handicap scores based on recent successful applications.
I’m personally on the fence - a scholarship may be the only chance for
some people
to attend, so spreading them widely seems to be fair. On the other hand,
repeat
visits help to build more lasting relationships.
But I do think this is a question that should have an explicit answer
either way.
Bye,
Stephan
--
------------------------------ It can be done!
---------------------------------
Please email me as schulz(a)eprover.org (Stephan Schulz)
------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l