Great idea. I have a couple of other folks I think would be very helpful on
a review board. I'll put this together.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Could we put together a LL review board for our
designs, with someone
from each of these groups? To give us fast feedback over the course
of the summer. An easier and more targeted request than looking for
people who have space and want to implement something new.
SJ
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Nate Hill <nathanielhill(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
re: similar projects around the world, check:
Kista Idea Lab, Stockholm
http://kistaidealab.se/
The innovation group at DOK, Delft
http://www.dok.info/
Pretty much everything going on in Aarhus DK
http://www.aakb.dk/
I have contacts at these places if there is anyone we wish to speak to
more
about their programs and experiences.
N
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Update posted to Mta:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/LibLabs
>
> We're still largely looking for abstract use cases, similar projects
> around the world, groups that would use a space in DC, and volunteers
> to staff the DCPL lab while others use it.
>
> Nate and I talked to the founders of "The Uni Project" which is
> implementing what could be considered a two- or three-module liblab
> (mainly for group reading, reconfigurable space, and workshops) in NYC
> and Boston. Lots of good overlap there; once we've nailed down an
> elevator pitch next month they might sign on as a partner.
>
>
[Cross-posting to the wm-dc for information only; please continue
discussion on the liblabs list!]
Sam.
--
Nate Hill
nathanielhill(a)gmail.com
http://www.natehill.net
--
Samuel Klein identi.ca:sj w:user:sj +1 617 529
4266