We could begin a ranting. Like a special hashtag that will go viral. At least to have
Twitter make those data open.
"We can understand that Twitter no logner wants to support it directly itself and
wants to save some costs, but there are certainly interesting data to keep which could be
reused in a possibly larger project as a translation memory and corpus useful for many
other free (of commercial) translation engines.”
i couldn’t agree more with this. We can do something!
On 26 Nov 2017, at 09:28, Vi to
<vituzzu.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I always dreamt of a free repository of structured translations (let's say a wikidata
of translations), maybe that's the time.
Vito
2017-11-25 18:19 GMT+01:00 Philippe Verdy <verdy_p(a)wanadoo.fr
<mailto:verdy_p@wanadoo.fr>>:
2017-11-25 17:47 GMT+01:00 Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il
<mailto:amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il>>:
Drat. I participated in the translation as a translator and a moderator. The closure of
the moderators community was announced a few months ago, but the volunteer translation
interface stayed alive. The total closure of the translation interface wasn't even
announced to the old timers. This is really sad and wrong, and I can't understand the
business logic in this.
Having their own custom software for translation is really not very smart, though. I hope
they come to their senses, nicely archive the old site, and then move to some other site,
such as Transifex, OneSky, or Pootle.
Despite being a former moderator, I can't think of anything smarter to reply, other
than ranting :(
That's waht ahappens when a commerial company advertizes that it creates a community
project and wants thme to contibute and give their work time but can shutdown it without
notice.
Twitter is alone not to do that (think about Google Map and its very unfair terms against
the contributors that Google wants to involve to do free work: Google could also shutdown
this at any time, and Google Mappers won't have any benefit, only Google wins)... So
yes we can be ranting: we should clearly continue to campaign against these pseudo open
projects lead in fact by corporates using unfair practices, only to increase their global
audience, then become a global facility that will then be licended only for very limited
use and with multiple filters (such as hiding relevant data and replacing it by commercial
placements where those that want to be visible MUST pay an increasing price without any
added value).
_______________________________________________
Translators-l mailing list
Translators-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Translators-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l>
_______________________________________________
Translators-l mailing list
Translators-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l