Personally I disagree. There are numerous projects within the Wikimedia
foundation and most of them rely on volunteers. If we cannot expand it to a
critical mass without throwing money at it perhaps we should first
reconsider the model.
Again I propose to look at some of the Frontiers journals. They have a huge
board of reviewers facilitating peer review. Perhaps we should invite more
editors too.
BW ML
Op vr 10 aug. 2018 22:54 schreef Jackie Koerner <jackie.koerner(a)gmail.com>om>:
I think this is a very reasonable proposal. I do think
this should be
discussed annually in case we need to adjust to be a more appropriate
amount. This would be, say as workload and demands increase, or as budget
overall increases, the stipend might be adjusted.
Best,
Jackie
--
Jackie Koerner, Ph.D.
Researcher & Visiting Scholar
jackiekoerner.com
On Aug 10, 2018, at 3:19 PM, Mikael Häggström <
editor.in.chief(a)wikijmed.org> wrote:
Hello again,
I have informed the board at WikiJMed that I would prefer to see someone
with more time than me to be the editor-in-chief when my term ends by New
Year, and the Assistant editor-in-chief has expressed a similar attitude to
it. Yet, the only other candidate to the editor-in-chief position has also
expressed reluctance to it. For the long term survival of the journals I
think we need to add a monetary compensation to editor-in-chiefs, and
practically also to add an incentive to apply to this position.
I think an annual compensation of let's say $2000 for each editor-in-chief
and $1000 for each assistant would be a humble start as part of the grant
application for next year, especially considering that average salaries for
editors-in-chief in the US are about $85.000 (link
<https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/editor-in-chief-salary-SRCH_KO0,15.htm>)
and $57.000 for assistants (link)
<https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/assistant-to-the-editor-in-chief-salary-SRCH_KO0,32.htm>.
Also, it is very humble comparing to the generally $100.000+ that many
people make within Wikimedia Foundation (link
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_salaries>), and the
income of $91 million that Wikimedia Foundation received in 2017 (link)
<https://annual.wikimedia.org/2017/financials.html>. Thus, we can
definitely adjust this amount further in the future depending on the
success of this grant application.
Best regards,
Mikael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"WJH board" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to wjhboard+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to wjhboard(a)googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
https://groups.google.com/group/wjhboard.
To view this discussion on the web, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjhboard/CACubOwiRUpiFW7qQmnhoyF8PzvMFOLW…
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjhboard/CACubOwiRUpiFW7qQmnhoyF8PzvMFOLWSeDuEjUNF3X1HrvcaGQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"WJM board" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to wjmboard+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to wjmboard(a)googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
https://groups.google.com/group/wjmboard.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/1B0C88E5-4A35-4182-87FD-BF132B4A…
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/1B0C88E5-4A35-4182-87FD-BF132B4AFF79%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.