Hi all,
There's been some further discussion at:
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal_User_Group#Integration_of_…
I think Philip needs to choose whether he primarily wants to be an author
or an editorial board member of a wikijournal, because it would be an
obvious conflict of interest if he was both.
We also need to to know what Philip is willing to do with the
wikijournal.org domain. If he doesn't want to donate it, I think it's in
order to apply for a Wikimedia grant to buy it from him for perhaps $300,
which I think is in the order of what he payed for it.
Best regards,
Mikael
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: NarayanChandra Ghosh <sis2017(a)iicb.res.in>
Date: 18 March 2017 at 23:46
Subject: Acceptance of Submitted Abstract for Presentation - SIS2017
To: das.diptanshu(a)gmail.com
*Dear Author(s),*
We are happy to inform you that your submission entitled *WikiJournal - A
new form of open access publishing* has been accepted for presentation in
the Conference on *Öpen Access: The Road to Freedom* and 33rd Annual
Convention of the Society for Information Science (SIS) to be held at
Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Jadavpur, (Kolkata) during April 7-8
2017.
Therefore you are requested to make your convenience to prepare your
presentation along with the registration formalities you require for the
purpose. You will be given approximately 7 minutes time for the power point
presentation of your work, but the same may be shorten due to time
constraints (if so arises).
The abstract will be considered for inclusion in the programme schedule as
well as in Pre-conference Souvenir, only after your registration latest by
31 March 2017. However, you are requested to register (online) at an
earliest possible to avoid inconveniences to the organizers.
Your cooperation in this regard will be highly solicited. Online
registration form is accessible from*:*
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdY4ujon8YF3iKiV5hR6I42
bszb4hz3x_wp3q1EoWGEsA-5xQ/viewform?c=0&w=1
Thanking you,
*Review Committee, SIS-2017*
*======================*
Hi all WikiJournal (at Wikiversity) participants!
So, there's been a major discussion about whether we should merge our
project with the one located at www.wikijournal.org, maintained by Philip
<https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=User:Fokebox&action=edit&redli…>
:
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal_User_Group#Developing_Wiki…
I've discussed this in the board of WikiJournal of Medicine
<https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine/Editors>, and
unfortunately it seems the aims of our project and that of Philip are
too different.
Mainly, he does not intend to implement peer review as a prerequisite for
article publication. With merely editorial review, the project would
essentially add nothing to the world, since there are already Wikipedia
articles with protection <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Protection>,
which basically works the same way. Also, as seem at his grant proposal to
Wikimedia Foundation,
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/Philip/WikiJournal.org/WikiJ…>
he has a vision of an "incorporated company", with huge monetary demands as
compared to for example the Wiki.J.Med budget
<https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine/Financials>.
Besides, as Thomas has pointed out:
"Although the domain wikijournal.org would be useful, there are plenty of
other viable options. Being journal.wikimedia.org would be completely fine.
So would wikipublish.org, or even wikijournal*s*.org. Searching
"wikijournal" on google finds us before wikijournal.org, and I suspect that
that will continue given googles algorithms. The WMF has a legal department
better able to answer trademark issues. If we wanted to be more sure of our
future position, we could ask the WMF to look into trademarking relevant
terms etc."
So, unless you disagree, I will shortly decline a merger. Philip would
still be welcome to join our project, with our mission
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group>, "to publish
scholarly works with no cost for the authors, apply quality checks on
submissions by expert peer review, and make accepted works available on the
Internet free of charge, in perpetuity." (Still, feel free to suggest
changes in this wording.)
Best regards,
Mikael
Hi all,
I forward this email about Wikimedia strategy discussions, in case someone
here is interested.
Best regards,
Mikael
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Nicole Ebber <nicole.ebber(a)wikimedia.de>
Date: Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 6:51 AM
Subject: [Strategy] Join the discussion on our strategic direction (Cycle
1: 10 March to 10 April)
To: haggstrom.mikael(a)gmail.com
Cc: Jaime Anstee <janstee(a)wikimedia.org>
Dear Wikimedians,
You are receiving this email because you are a representative of an
organized group (e.g. Wikimedia affiliate or committee).
In the last couple of months, Wikimedia Foundation staff, a designated
strategy team and a Community Process Steering Committee have designed a
process to gather input from all voices in the Wikimedia movement to define
the strategic direction of our movement over the next 15 years. The process
until Wikimania is divided into three discussion cycles, and cycle 1 will
run from 10 March to 10 April. And we need your participation!
There are different options for your group to participate: You can discuss
in person, onwiki or on other online platforms, as well as virtually via
telephone or video conferences. We have created a toolkit that will support
you with designing and hosting these conversations.
We are asking for at least one person from each organized group to
volunteer to be the Discussion Coordinator. This person will receive and
invitation to a Discussion Coordinator training and is responsible for:
* Inviting people to the discussion
* Hosting the discussion
* Summarizing the discussion
Please use the following links:
* Sign-up to be a Discussion Coordinator: https://docs.google.com/a/
wikimedia.de/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScyzOcB9FmgWWrenoe0RnCy
Xo6F9YZyustrmsrD0g0zTRr2Cg/viewform
<https://wikimedia-dot-yamm-track.appspot.com/Redirect?ukey=1R081hvVi4OqiAJT…>
* Use the discussion toolkit for organizing your group's conversations:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017/Toolkit
<https://wikimedia-dot-yamm-track.appspot.com/Redirect?ukey=1R081hvVi4OqiAJT…>
* Find out more about the movement strategy process:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017
<https://wikimedia-dot-yamm-track.appspot.com/Redirect?ukey=1R081hvVi4OqiAJT…>
This is the time many of us have been waiting for for years. I would love
to see each and every one of you make your voice heard and take the chance
to shape the future of our movement together. I am very much looking
forward to making this happen with all of you! Stay tuned for updates on
the process that we will publish next week, and please reach out to me with
any question you might have in the meantime.
Sincerely,
Nicole
PS - Note that all summaries submitted by 20 March will be used in the
strategy track during WMCON in Berlin 28 March - 2 April. If your group
meets after WMCON but by 10 April, your summary will still be synthesized
before Cycle 2 begins (late April).
PPS - I have joined the team as Track Lead on 1 March, which is made
possible through an agreement between Wikimedia Deutschland and the
Wikimedia Foundation. In the sense of a strategic partnership, our two
organizations have agreed that I will invest most of my time until the end
of the year towards this new role.
--
Nicole Ebber
Wikimedia Movement Strategy Lead
Track A: Organized Groups
[image: beacon]
I don't see what kind of vulnerability a deal like this would confer to us.
In any case, it doesn't seem harmful to ask for a price, so I now did at
his page at https://en.wikijournal.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal
On a side note, I'd like to welcome Felipe Schenone to our WikiJournal
Council
<https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal/WikiJournal_User_Group#WikiJour…>
(a group that still doesn't have any official status, but may soon have as
we push WikiJournal towards becoming a thematic organization
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_thematic_organizations>).
Best regards,
Mikael
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Gwinyai Masukume <parturitions(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm a little concerned about recent happenings. The domain wikijournal.org
> seemed to be inactive when the vote was done (now there's talk of hundreds
> of dollars). In my own view, a merger is off the table because the
> underlying philosophies are fundamentally different. In addition, we do not
> need that domain to function and using Wikimedia foundation funds to
> purchase domains opens us up to all sorts of vulnerability. Wikijournal of
> xx is unique enough in my view. I propose option 3, continuing as usual.
>
> Kindest regards,
> Gwinyai
>
> Apologies for brevity and typos - sent from mobile
>
> On 28 Feb 2017 20:05, "Mikael Häggström" <editor.in.chief(a)wikijmed.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Unfortunately, I don't find those 200 Russian pages at wikijournal.ru to
> fulfill our vision of a peer reviewed scientific journal, so I would oppose
> a merge. I agree we can ask him about what price he would be willing to
> have for the wikijournal.org domain. He could still continue to use the
> Russian wikijournal.ru domain which he previously used to redirect to the
> Russian site. It would never be worth the effort for us to secure every
> national version of the wikijournal domain.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mikael
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Diptanshu Das <das.diptanshu(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Wikijournal.org's tagline reads: Free, independent, international online
>> magazine
>> Wikimag.org is available. https://domainr.com/wikimag.org?q=wikimag
>> We could insist (request) to Philip that he migrates to this domain.
>> Perhaps this is more applicable for the purpose they intend to use it for.
>>
>> Regards
>> Diptanshu
>>
>>
>> Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to.
>>
>> On 28 February 2017 at 23:16, Diptanshu Das <das.diptanshu(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This is indeed a very crucial discussion. At some stage we should take
>>> it on wiki. It is also important to hear more and more people speak on this.
>>>
>>> I have checked the russian site. The translated version can be found
>>> here:
>>> https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&pr
>>> ev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fru.wikijournal.org%2Fwiki%2F
>>> Заглавная_страница&edit-text=&act=url
>>>
>>> My view is that we should ask Philip to name his price. Apart from that
>>> we should help him to relocate to another domain with the 200 or so
>>> articles that he has. We also need to reassure him that the relocated site
>>> would continue to earn equal revenue after an initial dip and that we would
>>> help in redirecting traffic to his new domain wherever applicable.
>>>
>>> I would not support a name change of our journal at this stage.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Diptanshu
>>>
>>>
>>> Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to.
>>>
>>> On 28 February 2017 at 19:08, Felipe Schenone <schenonef(a)gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I had a long talk with Philip, the owner of wikijournal.org
>>>>
>>>> He has worked on the project for 4 years, has 200 articles, 600 page
>>>> views per day and makes a dollar a day with advertising. He will NOT accept
>>>> to sell his domain for 300 dollars, it makes no sense.
>>>>
>>>> Also, I should mention that his main language is Russian, so a merge
>>>> with it would give us a Russian version of the project, which is something
>>>> to aim for if we want the project to grow.
>>>>
>>>> I think that there are three possible ways to go:
>>>> 1. Seek a merge
>>>> 2. Rename the project and secure the relevant .org domain from the
>>>> beginning
>>>> 3. Do nothing, keep developing WikiJournal on Wikiversity and see what
>>>> time brings
>>>>
>>>> If we want a merge, I seriously think we should ask Philip to name his
>>>> price and include that into the grant request, rather than offering him a
>>>> couple hundred dollars as if his work and time count for nothing. He is
>>>> currently well predisposed towards a merge, largely because I approached
>>>> him with respect for his work, so please don't screw it. A good
>>>> predisposition will lead him to ask a reasonable price, and will also keep
>>>> him active in the project after the merge.
>>>>
>>>> So what do you think? Should I ask what is his price?
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:40 PM Diptanshu Das <das.diptanshu(a)gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would favour starting a rapid grant request at the earliest. Prior to
>>>> our adoption of the name "WikiJournal" the present owner of the domain
>>>> WikiJournal.org was planning not to renew it. Mikael's communication had
>>>> confirmed the same. But the renewed interest in the name somehow got him
>>>> interested again, perhaps not for an independent project but for some
>>>> unstated impending gain. In such a case a direct monetary offer as well as
>>>> a trademark application seems essential.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Diptanshu
>>>> On 27-Feb-2017 1:43 AM, "Thomas Shafee" <thomas.shafee(a)gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'd support a buy-out of the WikiJournal domain. The existing project
>>>> there is almost empty and has barely been updated. A google search for
>>>> "WikiJournal" finds us before them. And "Wikijournal of X" finds the
>>>> relevant pages as first hits.
>>>>
>>>> I think that becoming the best known Wikijournal is more impedance than
>>>> being the only. Similarly, as we grow, we will overtake the "wiki journal
>>>> club" in Google pagerank prominence.
>>>>
>>>> The WMF seemed approve of the previous grant, so I think that a new
>>>> rapid grant would be a good idea. It achieves very clear outcomes, is low
>>>> cost, and works towards a larger goal of solidifying the WikiJournals (med
>>>> and sci) that address content quality issues they're consistently
>>>> interested in.
>>>>
>>>> I'll happily help out writing the grant if we go ahead (will be most
>>>> free late March).
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 26 Feb 2017 04:09, "Michaël Laurent" <michael.laurent(a)gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for sharing your thoughts, if more people would do so we would
>>>> advance faster imho.
>>>>
>>>> I think that having the most logical name and perhaps ask Philip to
>>>> donate the domain like you say, is better than a completely novel name
>>>> which is less easily understood.
>>>>
>>>> But I'd love to hear more from others.
>>>>
>>>> BW Michaël
>>>>
>>>> Op 26 feb. 2017 12:12 schreef "Gwinyai Masukume" <
>>>> parturitions(a)gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> If I'm not mistaken a rapid grant can be applied for at a moments
>>>> notice (rather than wait for ~one year)? In my view the sooner these issues
>>>> are attended to the better.
>>>>
>>>> Kindest regards,
>>>> Gwinyai
>>>>
>>>> Apologies for brevity and typos - sent from mobile.
>>>>
>>>> On 26 Feb 2017 10:17, "Diptanshu Das" <das.diptanshu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear All
>>>>
>>>> I would like to back Mikael. I also think that inclusion of $300 for
>>>> the domain and $200 for the trademark are justified. As of now I would not
>>>> be worried about the co-existence of another WikiJournal. However, I feel
>>>> that our tagline (or something similar) should contain something to
>>>> distinguish among the two.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Diptanshu Das
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to.
>>>>
>>>> On 26 February 2017 at 15:25, James Heilman <jmh649(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Having the same name is not a huge issue. For example there are three
>>>> medical journals called "Open Medicine" (one in Canada, one in Europe, and
>>>> one in the Arabic peninsula). There are also more than a dozen cities
>>>> called London https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_(disambiguation)
>>>>
>>>> J
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Mikael Häggström <
>>>> editor.in.chief(a)wikijmed.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I appreciate your views. As for the Wikimedia Journal name, we did have
>>>> a name vote a while ago to choose the current name, and that one was among
>>>> the candidates (but only received a few votes): https://en.wikiversity
>>>> .org/wiki/WikiJournal/Future_as_separate_Wikimedia_project#N
>>>> ame_election
>>>>
>>>> I don't find the co-existence of Philip's wikijournal.org to exclude
>>>> our usage of the WikiJournal name. Also, as I understand, his project is a
>>>> more inclusionist
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deletionism_and_inclusionism_in_Wikipedia> wiki
>>>> than Wikipedia, and supported by AdSense
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdSense> ads in the articles since his
>>>> goal is also to make it profitable. I actually doubt he will continue that
>>>> project in the long run. I think he bought the wikijournal.org for a
>>>> couple of hundred dollars, so in this year's grant application (link
>>>> to that of last year
>>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/Rapid/WikiJournal_of_Medicine>
>>>> ) I think we can also apply for a single addition of perhaps about
>>>> $300 to offer him for the domain, which I think he is likely to eventually
>>>> take. Although he has invested considerable time developing his project,
>>>> his project design is indeed different from our own visions, so I don't see
>>>> any other aspect of wikijournal.org that we should use apart from the
>>>> domain name. Nevertheless, I think we may also offer him credit as "creator
>>>> of the wikijournal.org domain" at our Milestones.
>>>> <https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine/About#Milestones>
>>>> In any case, I think we will get hold of the wikijournal.org domain
>>>> before becoming a separate Wikimedia project.
>>>>
>>>> Although WikiJournal of Medicine is a registered non-profit
>>>> organization, the WikiJournal name is not yet registered as a trademark by
>>>> anyone. Perhaps we should add $200 to the next grant application to have
>>>> the trademark registered, and then have it recognized internationally
>>>> through the Madrid system.
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madrid_system>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Mikael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Daniel Mietchen <
>>>> daniel.mietchen(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> I have not been privy to those past conversations but here are my
>>>> comments anyway:
>>>> - I am not thrilled about the name WikiJournal, given that
>>>> https://wikijournal.org/ exists and what it does.
>>>> - there is still room to sort out naming issues as long as we are not
>>>> formally organized
>>>> - there was a similar situation with Wikitravel, which resulted in the
>>>> name change to Wikivoyage
>>>> - another similar situation arose with WikiProject Med, which wanted
>>>> to be registered as "Wikimedia Medicine", but that was not OKed by WMF
>>>> - I am not sure having WikiJournal (under whatever name) as a
>>>> different sister project is the best way to move forward, and in any
>>>> case, it is not obvious to me how Philip could help with that other
>>>> than by contributing the domain.
>>>> - If it were to become a new sister project, why not just go for
>>>> something like https://journal.wikimedia.org and perhaps "Wikimedia
>>>> Journal"?
>>>> - I think it makes sense to aim at becoming a thematic organization as
>>>> a next step, once the naming issue is sorted out
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Gwinyai Masukume
>>>> <parturitions(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hi Diptanshu,
>>>> >
>>>> > Several of us were not keen on Wikijournal because the name had
>>>> already been
>>>> > used. I guess the naming issue is now water under the bridge.
>>>> >
>>>> > Kindest regards,
>>>> > Gwinyai
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Diptanshu Das <
>>>> das.diptanshu(a)gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> If you people remember, I had initially spoken against adaptation of
>>>> the
>>>> >> name Wikijournal. It was because of the confusion that entities like
>>>> >> https://en.wikijournal.org/wiki/WikiJournal may create. The
>>>> subsequent vote
>>>> >> shifted toward WikiJournal and that is perfectly ok but our by-laws
>>>> should
>>>> >> clearly mention about this WikiJournal, the Wiki Journal Club etc.
>>>> stating
>>>> >> that these are independent and un-affiliated.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Regards
>>>> >> Diptanshu
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On 25 February 2017 at 01:57, Mikael Häggström
>>>> >> <editor.in.chief(a)wikijmed.org> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi WikiJournal participants!
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I had a talk with the domain owner of wikijournal.orgrecently, and
>>>> it is
>>>> >>> possible to merge our projects if we attain a WikiJournal/Future as
>>>> separate
>>>> >>> Wikimedia project - see also talk entry there at
>>>> >>> en.wikijournal.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal. I think the most
>>>> important next
>>>> >>> step is to become a "thematic organization", proving that we can
>>>> work as a
>>>> >>> separate organization: I can start a draft of bylaws soon.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Best regards,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Mikael
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> --
>>>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups
>>>> >>> "wjmboard" group.
>>>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>> send an
>>>> >>> email to wjmboard+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> >>> To post to this group, send email to wjmboard(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> >>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/CACubOwjTwhEAY320
>>>> pyqNh1GftLh0VDHJu1nSL5k9crwgVZAftg%40mail.gmail.com.
>>>> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups
>>>> >> "wjmboard" group.
>>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>> send an
>>>> >> email to wjmboard+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> >> To post to this group, send email to wjmboard(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/CADcdAx-0D5B1Xd%3
>>>> DfUcwbO38Z%2B_DeszAnuyn01zKEBsY05HVEQQ%40mail.gmail.com.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > WikiJournal-en mailing list
>>>> > WikiJournal-en(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikijournal-en
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "wjmboard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to wjmboard+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to wjmboard(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>>>> gid/wjmboard/CACubOwh%2B_c5pPsYUFq3%2BdZcyYJ4-%3DoxhqJQ1qwTq
>>>> 47AUvx7g8w%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/CACubOwh%2B_c5pPsYUFq3%2BdZcyYJ4…>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> James Heilman
>>>> MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
>>>>
>>>> The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "wjmboard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to wjmboard+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to wjmboard(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>>>> gid/wjmboard/CAF1en7UQGSR7EV4sqtYELsHxBUuKmKf-hAgWahMb1jPau2
>>>> d_Lw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/CAF1en7UQGSR7EV4sqtYELsHxBUuKmKf…>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "wjmboard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to wjmboard+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to wjmboard(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>>>> gid/wjmboard/CADcdAx8zB-bD1T4mMpmpv%2BLbfgjJaWTPWQ_QP91VLcWB
>>>> vy5MvQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/CADcdAx8zB-bD1T4mMpmpv%2BLbfgjJa…>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "wjmboard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to wjmboard+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to wjmboard(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>>>> gid/wjmboard/CAN7k9T%2BDhEDhz2JP6no5wdLgpoWrB7pqOpFJibd1-G0y
>>>> 8W0Ugg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/CAN7k9T%2BDhEDhz2JP6no5wdLgpoWrB…>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "wjmboard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to wjmboard+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to wjmboard(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>>>> gid/wjmboard/CAJikOOxcmCJv_DTBdk%3DXftrRTy-922KKB2DimHnCiD_u
>>>> %2B20U0A%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/CAJikOOxcmCJv_DTBdk%3DXftrRTy-92…>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "wjmboard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to wjmboard+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to wjmboard(a)googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>>>> gid/wjmboard/CAFikvs02oqTXzCJWDJ_Q6n0XXBHsVDaw612vDmf5D3eiKy
>>>> hhLA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/CAFikvs02oqTXzCJWDJ_Q6n0XXBHsVDa…>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> WikiJournal-en mailing list
>>>> WikiJournal-en(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikijournal-en
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> WikiJournal-en mailing list
>>>> WikiJournal-en(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikijournal-en
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "wjmboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to wjmboard+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to wjmboard(a)googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>> gid/wjmboard/CADcdAx9CaWRjgN_1CBhwJKO65q24HZt6qNWQ%2B0BwGx6e
>> KgS1XQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/CADcdAx9CaWRjgN_1CBhwJKO65q24HZt…>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "wjmboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to wjmboard+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to wjmboard(a)googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
> gid/wjmboard/CACubOwjFzGx9FnnEQuAuT%2Brrc5-yRRfR83mBaOV0X_
> bLsiORzQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wjmboard/CACubOwjFzGx9FnnEQuAuT%2Brrc5-yR…>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>