Just relax it's no big deal. The check users are usually quit reasonable than admins. If there's no evidence of violations the images are going nowhere.
BR
-Masssly
Sent from Samsung Mobile
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Nkansah Rexford <nkansahrexford(a)gmail.com> </div><div>Date:07/03/2015 20:49 (GMT+00:00) </div><div>To: Wikimedia-gh <Wikimedia-gh(a)lists.wikimedia.org> </div><div>Cc: Mailing list for African Wikimedians <african-wikimedians(a)lists.wikimedia.org> </div><div>Subject: [Wikimedia-GH] Fwd: 24.130.172.5 left you a message on Wikipedia </div><div>
</div>
Now reported for copyvios. I'm now before The Hague of Wikipedia.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Wikipedia <no-reply-notifications(a)wikipedia.org>
Date: Sat, Mar 7, 2015, 19:36
Subject: 24.130.172.5 left you a message on Wikipedia
To: Nkansahrexford <nkansahrexford(a)gmail.com>
24.130.172.5 left a message on your talk page in "CCI Notice".
Hello, Nkansahrexford. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contrib...
View message View changes
To control which emails we send you, check your preferences.
Wikimedia Foundation, 149 New Montgomery St., 3rd Fl., San Francisco, CA 94105, USA
There are many policies on Wikipedia, and I also joined with my own
policies.
One is, if a legitimate content I upload to Wikipedia is deleted by someone
or something at the other end of the world, I dont and won't contest for
its undeletion. Never!
I received these images listed here that has been marked for deletion ( see
close to bottom of page)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nkansahrexford#File:Peace_Hyde…
explicitly from either the celeb herself or from her manager.
They are nominated for deletion.
An article about Ashesi University's found that has seen about 200,000
views since it was started has been nominated for deletion on grounds that
make no sense.
"Patrick Awuah, Jr." on @Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Awuah%2C_Jr.
Just saying.
Contributions from well meaning individuals go to fix the imbalance
whatever of africa we all preach about, and IP addresses delete them
without any substantive reasons. And no one cares. Feels to me machines do
those deletions instead of humans.
Are machines taking over editing on Wikipedia? Or because of these weird
activities, humans are no longer contributing their time, and rather bots
and machines are taking over?
I'm in flames here!
@Rexford
And I just noticed Rocky Dawuni has also now been deleted. What's happening...
-Masssly
Sent from Samsung Mobile
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Nkansah Rexford <nkansahrexford(a)gmail.com> </div><div>Date:04/03/2015 20:12 (GMT+00:00) </div><div>To: Mailing list for African Wikimedians <african-wikimedians(a)lists.wikimedia.org> </div><div>Cc: Wikimedia-gh <Wikimedia-gh(a)lists.wikimedia.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-GH] [African Wikimedians] Some IP deleting uploads and articles </div><div>
</div>And those elephants, instead of spending time chasing the not so good articles and high level crappy images on Wikipedia, they rather go on easy prey and articles relating to celebs not well known, of course because persons like myself are toothless and won't have anything to do.
Something I always envisioned happening as long as the whole of Africa has no Wikipedia admin to turn around decisions like these.
You know, its hard to think Africanish, if you weren't born as one.
Those elephants are interested in the unnecessaries and instead take fun in deleting articles with so much potential
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015, 20:08 bobby shabangu <bobbyshabangu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Exactly... I believe this was one of the elephants we were trying to tackle at Wiki indaba right?
On Mar 4, 2015 9:57 PM, "Nkansah Rexford" <nkansahrexford(a)gmail.com> wrote:
How Wikipedia rolls? How does it? Deleting legitimate articles and images because someone at the other end dont know the true origin and considers every celeb image on Wikipedia to be copyright?
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015, 19:55 bobby shabangu <bobbyshabangu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is that one of your policies too !!!
I used to be in flames and be super furious but after I realized how we roll I just chilled. So unfortunately this is how we roll don't worry just chill and keep on editing, the machines will decide if your edits are worthy to be part of sum of all human knowledge.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Nkansah Rexford <nkansahrexford(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There are many policies on Wikipedia, and I also joined with my own policies.
One is, if a legitimate content I upload to Wikipedia is deleted by someone or something at the other end of the world, I dont and won't contest for its undeletion. Never!
I received these images listed here that has been marked for deletion ( see close to bottom of page) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nkansahrexford#File:Peace_Hyde… explicitly from either the celeb herself or from her manager.
They are nominated for deletion.
An article about Ashesi University's found that has seen about 200,000 views since it was started has been nominated for deletion on grounds that make no sense.
"Patrick Awuah, Jr." on @Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Awuah%2C_Jr.
Just saying.
Contributions from well meaning individuals go to fix the imbalance whatever of africa we all preach about, and IP addresses delete them without any substantive reasons. And no one cares. Feels to me machines do those deletions instead of humans.
Are machines taking over editing on Wikipedia? Or because of these weird activities, humans are no longer contributing their time, and rather bots and machines are taking over?
I'm in flames here!
_______________________________________________
African-Wikimedians mailing list
African-Wikimedians(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/african-wikimedians
_______________________________________________
African-Wikimedians mailing list
African-Wikimedians(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/african-wikimedians
_______________________________________________
African-Wikimedians mailing list
African-Wikimedians(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/african-wikimedians
_______________________________________________
African-Wikimedians mailing list
African-Wikimedians(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/african-wikimedians
I have submitted a presentation about the Wikipedia Primary School project for Wikimania 2015 in Mexico City.
https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Are_we_really_an_educa…
we have been working for 1 year now on the project making a pilot in South Africa and we trust the experience is starting producing a new methodology and it can be replicated. it would be great to have your feedback to make it better.
basically what we are working on is to review articles, involve scholars and getting the South African primary school content improved on Wikipedia (sometimes content is already good, often the summery is not clear, sometimes articles are missing and other times examples and content is not very international). Some of the articles selected are probably relevant for several curricula around the world and it would be great to test the experience in other countries.
if you are interested in the topic please sign up to support the presentation. and join the discussion online or at Wikimania if possible.
thanks
iolanda
Hello all
The three winning pictures selected by the official jury have been
published !
I invite you to check out the results here:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Loves_Africa_2014/Winners
Congratulations to all those who participated !
A side note:
I have been able to get in touch with the first two winners, but
unfortunately not the third :(
The second winner, Dina, has a facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/Dinasaidphotography
where quite a few pictures are posted.
If some of those pictures seem to be worth it for Commons, it might be
the right time to ask for more pictures from Dina ;)
If anyone feel like asking her... please do.
Anthere
Hi, interesting, yes. Wikipedia was lucky that the research was done by academic Wikipedia outsiders , and Americans, who only researched a very limited topic about US - Democratic Party keywords...
I have been noticing for long in religious topics that there are heaps of partisan articles just telling legends in a factual language. Just look at topics concerning Ismailis (Pir_Sadardin), Hindu saints (Sakkiya_Nayanar ), (Bhagat_Puran_Singh), Islamic mystics or a number of catholic saints.
I assume that the same mechanism works also on other topics: wherever there is a tradition of thought, not well known to outsiders or of little interest outside a community, there is less probability of critical reflection ad edits from outside.
Which I would not expect to happen in Britannica to that extent.
Cheers! Kipala
On 2 February 2015 at 12:49, Grant McNulty <grant(a)mcnulty.co.za> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I came across this article that I thought would be of interest to you:
> http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/7689.html
> Cheers,
> Grant
