Only for the scans which they do themselves if at all but you cannot
blame them for trying.
Since you can take pretty much everything out (8 items at a time for
10 weeks) this may be inconvenient (if they don't let you photograph
in place) but no worse than inconvenient. I haven't tried copying in
the library itself personally.
Andrew
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Sam Korn <smoddy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Andrew Cates
<Andrew(a)soschildren.org> wrote:
Hmm, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_University_Library#Legal_deposit_lib…
I am not sure the British Library has more and access is harder than
at Cambridge.
On quality I did images of this quality
http://www.john-leech-archive.org.uk/sample.htm from a book with a
good digital camera. Photocopies are generally not allow on bound
books. A camera with a good lens is better in my view
The UL has an (excellent) imaging service -- they photocopied me
several hundred pages of my set texts last year. They do a scanning
service, but they appear to claim copyright on the scans.
See
http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/deptserv/imagingservices/index.html and
especially
http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/deptserv/imagingservices/reproductionrights.html
I don't know if this claim of copyright is valid...
--
Sam
PGP public key:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sam_Korn/public_key
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l