On 25 June 2012 19:48, Charles Matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com>
wrote:
OK, I have an answer of sorts. To me fixing the
SSL looks urgent. So one
could say that paying the going commercial rate to have it fixed, by
someone
who knows what he or she is doing, is a good
idea. Then the hiring of a
technical person (I think a CTO is needed right now, not a dev, but that
appears to be a minority view) could proceed uncluttered by that
decision.
What you are telling me, Tom, is that this is not
the way the Board
thinks.
I don't see how the decision about hiring a technical staffer is
"cluttered" by the fact that we have jobs we need the technical staff
to do... if there weren't such jobs, we wouldn't be hiring someone to
do them.
Well, Mike has explained the current position now, so we don't need the
labour
the hypotheticals. I only wish I had the technical chops to be
reassured.
Charles