On 25 June 2012 19:48, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> OK, I have an answer of sorts. To me fixing the SSL looks urgent. So one
> could say that paying the going commercial rate to have it fixed, by someone
> who knows what he or she is doing, is a good idea. Then the hiring of a
> technical person (I think a CTO is needed right now, not a dev, but that
> appears to be a minority view) could proceed uncluttered by that decision.
> What you are telling me, Tom, is that this is not the way the Board thinks.

I don't see how the decision about hiring a technical staffer is
"cluttered" by the fact that we have jobs we need the technical staff
to do... if there weren't such jobs, we wouldn't be hiring someone to
do them.