guys i would do without ur advice. i see most of u r either studying and have just
finished college. if you go with such blinkers on historical facts and social context,
there is serious trouble on the way.
Basavaraj N Itnal
--- On Sat, 2/26/11, Sathyam Vellal <sathyam.vellal(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From: Sathyam Vellal <sathyam.vellal(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-in-blr] [Wikimediaindia-l] ToI front page: Rs 1 cr for Sanskrit
WP
To: "Mailing list for Wikimedians / Wikipedians in & from Bangalore, India"
<wikimedia-in-blr(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Date: Saturday, February 26, 2011, 1:32 PM
Basavaraj,
First : Wikipedia is for editing/adding articles. So if u like corrections in them, please
do so instead of unwanted talk.
Second : Wikipedia is a global venture and not a local one for customizing policies! Every
country is capable of creating its own Wiki-like facility. If you are so not interested in
here, its better that you leave and start one of your own according to your and
"social" needs.
Third : Sanskrit is the Mother of languages in India. You agree that the knowledge is now
available in English and many other languages also. The people of old India were asked to
follow certain rules and now we know the true fact behind them. If the facts behind
something are disclosed people will want to deliberatly cross it.
Fourth : You've been provided with links to the pali wikipedia. If you want to develop
it, you are gladly welcome to contribute! That is our aim.
Fifth : Before you talk about "social relevance", I want you to do this. Go to a
person and give him an encyclopedia. It can be anything, Encarta or britannica, your wish.
And ask him the social relevance of those because they came first.
This is not a forum to express your personal feelings about something and please keep that
out of discussion.
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Swaroop Rao <raul.swaroop(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Wikipedia is a world encyclopedia. Please let us not discuss general topics over here. We
are all glad to have you as a distinguished Pali contributor.
Swaroop G Rao
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 18:28, Basavaraj Itnal <basavarajitnal(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
arun, while i like some corrections in some articles, primarily i am concerned more about
what wiki is contributing to Indian knowledge base and how. and i guess wiki policies need
customising for Indian society.
Basavaraj N Itnal
--- On Sat, 2/26/11, Basavaraj Itnal <basavarajitnal(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Basavaraj Itnal <basavarajitnal(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-in-blr] [Wikimediaindia-l] ToI front page: Rs 1 cr for Sanskrit
WP
To: "IndiaMailing list for Wikimedians / Wikipedians in & from Bangalore"
<wikimedia-in-blr(a)lists.wikimedia.org>rg>, "Arun Ramarathnam"
<arunram25(a)gmail.com>
Date: Saturday, February 26, 2011, 12:51 PM
explain. how social relevance of sanskrit is out of scope of wiki in sanskrit and govt
funding to it? do you guys discuss social relavance of what you are doing at all? if yes,
where? if no, that is a grave ommission.
Basavaraj N Itnal
--- On Sat, 2/26/11, Arun Ramarathnam <arunram25(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From: Arun Ramarathnam <arunram25(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-in-blr] [Wikimediaindia-l] ToI front page: Rs 1 cr for Sanskrit
WP
To: "Mailing list for Wikimedians / Wikipedians in & from Bangalore, India"
<wikimedia-in-blr(a)lists.wikimedia.org>rg>, "Basavaraj Itnal"
<basavarajitnal(a)yahoo.com>
Date: Saturday, February 26, 2011, 12:47 PM
Basavaraj,
The social relevance of Sanskrit in India, is not a topic that is in the scope if this
list.
It is a much larger topic.
As far as your observations on factual inaccuracies of some articles, that is certainly
something you can take up on the talk page of the respective wiki page. There may be more
knowledgeable contributors on the subject who can comment on it.
Could you also please refer the following links or pages that may assist you further:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Accuracy_dispute
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Fact_and_Reference_Check
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us/Article_problem/Factual_e…
Thank you
Arun
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Basavaraj Itnal <basavarajitnal(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
this is about social relevance of sanskrit to India. and some concomitant errenous
insertions.
Basavaraj N Itnal
--- On Sat, 2/26/11, Prateek Ramachandra <prateek.vr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From: Prateek Ramachandra <prateek.vr(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-in-blr] [Wikimediaindia-l] ToI front page: Rs 1 cr for Sanskrit
WP
To: "Mailing list for Wikimedians / Wikipedians in & from Bangalore, India"
<wikimedia-in-blr(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Cc: "Basavaraj Itnal" <basavarajitnal(a)yahoo.com>
Date: Saturday, February 26, 2011, 12:00 PM
Guys... what are we discussing here??? Please stop discussing about non-relevant topics...
focus on sanskrit wiki... please start another discussion if anyone has anything else to
say...
I
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Basavaraj Itnal <basavarajitnal(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
correct version of lingayatism as opposed to brahmanicised version on wiki..
http://www.everyculture.com/South-Asia/Lingayat-Religion-and-Expressive-Cul…
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hubli/Lingayat-is-an-independent-re…
http://www.deccanherald.com/content/134566/veerashaivas-urged-register-ling…
Basavaraj N Itnal
--- On Sat, 2/26/11, Gautam John <gautam(a)prathambooks.org> wrote:
From: Gautam John <gautam(a)prathambooks.org>
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-in-blr] [Wikimediaindia-l] ToI front page: Rs 1 cr for Sanskrit
WP
To: "Mailing list for Wikimedians / Wikipedians in & from Bangalore, India"
<wikimedia-in-blr(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Date: Saturday, February 26, 2011, 11:30 AM
On 26 February 2011 16:57, Basavaraj
Itnal <basavarajitnal(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
wiki has to recognise and be sensitive to these
concerns.
It is, in it's content drawing on it's policies of being
an
encyclopedia and being neutral. These are very powerful
pillars that
promote neutrality of points of view.
Thank you.
Best,
Gautam
________
http://social.prathambooks.org/
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-blr mailing list
Wikimedia-in-blr(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-blr
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-blr mailing list
Wikimedia-in-blr(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-blr
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-blr mailing list
Wikimedia-in-blr(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-blr
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-blr mailing list
Wikimedia-in-blr(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-blr
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-blr mailing list
Wikimedia-in-blr(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-blr
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-blr mailing list
Wikimedia-in-blr(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-blr
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-blr mailing list
Wikimedia-in-blr(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-blr