Elisabeth Anderl wrote:
Hello all, this is a very old and often discussed
issue,
the problems raised with the logo were not yet addressed (such as copyright
issues, which characters to use), and the new 'logo' is IMHO the most ugly
thing I have ever seen.
Btw.: from
alexa.com:
Where people go on
Wiktionary.org:
-
en.wiktionary.org - 48.6% <- old logo
-
de.wiktionary.org - 12.8% <- old logo
-
fr.wiktionary.org - 9.7% <- new logo
-
ru.wiktionary.org - 3.6% <- old logo
-
es.wiktionary.org - 3.1% <- old logo
-
ja.wiktionary.org - 2.9% <- old logo
-
pl.wiktionary.org - 2.4% <- old logo
-
pt.wiktionary.org - 2.3% <- old logo
-
it.wiktionary.org - 1.6% <- new logo
-
el.wiktionary.org - 1.5% <- new logo
Guess how many Wiktionarians apprently like the new logo...
I didn't take part in the discussion and the vote, but this is a poor
attempt to justify the old logo. People do not look at a web site like
Wiktionary because of the logo.
Best regards, E.
Regards,
Yann
--
http://www.non-violence.org/ | Site collaboratif sur la non-violence
http://www.forget-me.net/ | Alternatives sur le Net
http://fr.wikisource.org/ | Bibliothèque libre
http://wikilivres.info | Documents libres