Hoi,
I do not understand your question. The use of the standard is free. It is
so by definition. The only thing that might be proprietary is the text of
the standard itself. There is no problem in using the code. You know it and
it has always been this way.
As important, there is no credible alternative.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 20 May 2015 at 10:36, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
May somebody clarify that Unicode data is free?
PD or CC-BY-SA
compatible. Or they are not and you are promoting contribution to the
proprietary data?
I could see that every file has link to this copyright:
http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html
(BTW, I spent significant time of work to incorporate Unicode data
into this project, assuming that I am getting here valid information.
Which is not the case, obviously.)
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi,
Thank you Minh
Gerard
On 26 April 2015 at 20:17, Minh Nguyen <mxn(a)1ec5.org> wrote:
> On 2015-04-24 08:37, Milos Rancic wrote:
>
>> CLDR is not the right place for that. There are no translations of
>> languages inside of it.
>>
>
> There certainly are:
>
>
>
http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/27/by_type/locale_display_names.language…
--
Minh Nguyen <mxn(a)1ec5.org>
Jabber: mxn(a)1ec5.org; Blog:
http://notes.1ec5.org/
_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
Wiktionary-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
Wiktionary-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
Wiktionary-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
Wiktionary-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org