This does indeed seem to make some assumptions:
* That WMF is not already in contact with relevant human rights
organizations
* That including these individuals in a writing campaign is indeed
considered the best approach to help them at this point
* That a public association of this type is considered a best practice
regarding the safety of other Wikimedians who are at risk, both now and in
the future
I'm not sure if I see the benefit of tying a collaboration regarding the
safety of individuals to a writing effort on Wikipedia. Shouldn't we be
interested in improving those articles regardless? Wouldn't human rights
organizations care about individuals such as these regardless? Tying them
together could come across like we're horse trading - which would reflect
poorly on both efforts on such a sensitive topic.
I don't have the insight whether these assumptions would hold - but I
appreciate your thinking along. What I hear throughout the discussion, is a
group of community members that care, and seem to offer to help. I hope
that the WMF human rights team takes that information into account as they
evaluate the options. But I also realize that they do have a full plate,
and responding to these discussions is probably not their first priority. I
hope some of the voices here will participate in the to-be-announced office
hours.
Lodewijk
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:12 PM Lauren Worden <laurenworden89(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
There are some good ideas in this thread, but
nothing concrete,
actionable, and to which Foundation officials have been able and
willing to give a clear, simple yes or no answer. Here is a simple and
concrete proposal which could be started immediately:
Foundation personnel should reach out to Amnesty International
leadership (i.e.,
https://www.amnesty.org/en/about-us/secretary-general-and-senior-leadership…
)
asking them to include the jailed Arabic Wikipedia administrators in
their Write for Rights campaign
(
https://www.amnesty.org/en/get-involved/write-for-rights/) and in
return offering to fund a Wikipedian in Residence editor position at a
level sufficient to improve the articles on subjects of their
campaigns as the availability of reliable sources allow.
This would not require public discussion of individual cases by
Foundation officials. Presumably the Foundation would be able to act
on such a plan without additional authorization from the Trustees.
Are there any downsides?
-LW
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 9:37 AM Christophe Henner
<christophe.henner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Crap I?ve hit sent too early!
I am not sure it exists, but in line with Lodewijk comment having a
guide on how
can people help and/or a place where people can list
themselves to make it known they can be reached to help on those topics,
could be ways to leverage our communities in those instances.
Christophe
On Oct 8, 2023, at 6:34?PM, Christophe Henner <
christophe.henner(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
?Bassel was at a time when there was little to none activity on those
topics.
Since then the approach got professionalized.
I understand the lack of information is frustrated, but most of the
time any
action taken has to be confidential.
Having been on the other side of curtain a bit, it?s one of the
toughest topic
there is.
On Oct 8, 2023, at 6:25?PM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466(a)gmail.com> wrote:
?
Thanks, Lane.
The WMF published numerous Diff posts on Bassel. I believe the first
one was in
October 2015, less than a week after Bassel was killed:
#FREEBASSEL: Free culture advocate who built 3D renderings of Palmyra
missing in
Syria
https://diff.wikimedia.org/2015/10/08/bassel-missing-syria/
As for media coverage, in January 2016 Jimmy Wales wrote an article
about Bassel
for CNN:
Wikipedia founder: Information can beat oppression
https://edition.cnn.com/2016/01/20/opinions/wales-wikipedia-information-bea…
In March 2016, Jimmy Wales and Orit Kopel published an article on
Bassel in The
Guardian, again suggesting a hashtag:
"The world needs to ask: #whereisBassel?"
https://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2016/mar/16/jimmy-wales-the-wor…
The Foundation's silence on Osama and Ziyad is in marked contrast to
that.
Andreas
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 3:04?PM Lane Rasberry <lanerasberry(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> "Have there been any recent cases where community voices were
mobilized
to contribute to national or international campaigns for
someone's release?"
>
> We organized Wikipedia editing events in 2011-12 for Aaron Swartz.
Events were
not so documented back then, but there were wiki meetups in the
United States before and after his death.
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz
>
> In 2016-17 we did events for Bassell, not knowing that he had already
passed.
Here is some of what I can find but the events were organized in
anticipation of his release.
activism
in response to the legal accusations against them. I do not know
if we ever had storytelling or journalism documenting that though.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 4:46?PM Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Have there been any recent cases where community voices were
mobilized to
contribute to national or international campaigns for
someone's release?
>>
>> It sounds like a community group, working to support others, might be
an
outlet for interest in advocating for those in jail, and maintaining up
to date information on their condition and needs, ways to get letters to
them, &c. They could get advice from the WMF team, and work with and
through Amnesty (et al). The reasons that a specific org might not want to
advocate openly for a victim may not apply to individuals, who have their
own leverage and can advocate on behalf of humanity.
>>
>> SJ
>>
>>
>> ????
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 2:58 PM Maggie Dennis <mdennis(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello, all.
>>>
>>>
>>> I?m Maggie Dennis. I?m the VP who oversees our human rights team in
its work. Reiterating what the team previously said about not being able to
discuss particular situations, I can disclose a little more general points
about our approach as you pose, LW, and, I hope, address some of your
concerns, Lodewijk.
>>>
>>>
>>> It?s devastating when community members face targeting for their
dedication to supporting free knowledge. This matters a lot to me, to my
team, and to all the Foundation. I know it matters to you as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> The Wikimedia Foundation does resource this important work. We have
partners in this field with whom we collaborate closely. Our human rights
team possesses extensive experience in addressing such issues and also
maintains strong connections with NGOs specializing in these areas. We
regularly engage with these organizations on both general matters and
specific cases.
>>>
>>>
>>> Every situation in which a community member is targeted is unique,
and
we recognize the need for specialized responses and support. Volunteer
well-being is our priority, and we are committed to providing the right
assistance for each case. While we believe in the importance of public
discourse and transparency, safety always takes precedence. In some
instances, the Foundation has found it appropriate to speak publicly to
address these challenges and have done so. In others, we may be advised to
handle matters differently.
>>>
>>>
>>> In terms of some Wikimedians who might have concerns whether our
strategy is the right one, I fully respect that there must be. Because each
case is different and frequently these situations are highly complex, we
know that even different expert organizations might rank the risk and the
right response of a specific situation differently. We have sometimes
sought multiple opinions on a case. At the end of the day, we collaborate
closely with relevant groups on our response to ensure the safety and
well-being of individuals affected and the broader community members who
could be impacted. We do the best we can to uphold the principles of free
knowledge while prioritizing safety for everyone.
>>>
>>>
>>> While I can?t discuss specific cases, I am always happy to talk
about
general matters of policy and approach in my quarterly community
conversations. We will also answer questions to the extent that we believe
we safely can that are posed about the team?s work to
talktohumanrights(a)wikimedia.org. Depending on the case,the human rights
team may provide ways to help or avenues to connect with organizations who
are supporting. They may also be able to advise when silence is regarded as
the best response. (There are some risks to being too open about who we
work with and how we work that we need to consider every time.)
>>>
>>>
>>> People can read more generally about the human rights team here.
>>>
>>>
>>> While this is not my area of focus in my role at the Foundation, I
also want to generally call out that the Foundation also conducts human
rights advocacy routinely in regards to legislation. Our Global Advocacy
team not only meets with legislators around the world to fight for the
rights that keep free knowledge free, but also considers and guides our
work by providing proactive human rights assessments and policy
development, such as the Human Rights Policy.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Maggie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 3:14?AM Lauren Worden <
laurenworden89(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear WMF Human Rights Team:
>>>>
>>>> I would like some clarification on your statement below. In
>>>> particular, does your stated approach allow you to follow the best
>>>> practices described at
>>>>
https://freedomhouse.org/2023/summit-for-democracy-political-prisoners
>>>> to, e.g., "meet regularly
with family members of political
prisoners,
>>>> advocacy groups, and media
outlets and journalists, in public and in
>>>> private, in their efforts to secure an individual?s release"?
>>>>
>>>> The literature review at
>>>>
https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/17277
states:
>>>> "The theoretical and
empirical literature attributes several
potential
>>>> roles to civil society in
[security sector and justice reform].
These
>>>> include making security and
justice institutions accountable,
>>>> mobilising a range of social groups for reform, publicising abuses
and
>>>> advocating for reform, offering
technical expertise, and improving
>>>> security-citizen relations."
>>>>
>>>> If the Foundation staff has prohibited itself from engaging with the
>>>> public on freeing jailed wikipedians, orchestrating letter writing
>>>> campaigns, or coordinating with other NGOs and government agencies,
>>>> such as those Andreas has described as having no record of the
>>>> imprisoned Arabic Wikipedia administrators, then I would hope that
the
>>>> CEO or Trustees would step in
immediately to rectify any internal
>>>> policies such that best practices can be upheld.
>>>>
>>>> -LW
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 3:51?PM WMF Human Rights
>>>> <talktohumanrights(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > In the interest of safeguarding confidential information and
ensuring the safety of our community members, the Foundation will not
publicly disclose details regarding human rights cases. The Human Rights
Team recently updated its meta page to clarify this approach. Our primary
concern is to uphold the safety and privacy of everyone involved. At the
same time, our inability to discuss these matters should not be read as
inaction. We care deeply about volunteer safety and our role, more
generally, involves different levels of internal support, wider advocacy
and partnerships with others depending on the circumstances of an event.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:06?AM Andreas Kolbe
<jayen466(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Let's put it a different way then:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Is anyone at the WMF doing anything in support of the two jailed
Saudi Wikimedians, be it liaising with international or regional human
rights organisations, the US State Department, briefing journalists so the
wider public is aware of the situation, or anything else to make sure Osama
and Ziyad aren't forgotten about as they start (by my calculation) their
fourth year in jail?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I am asking because the press reports published at the start of
this year do not seem to have led to any significant coverage of the two
Wikimedians' plight on the websites of major human rights organisations.
(If I have missed any, please let me know.)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> For example, I found nothing at all on the website of Reporters
without Borders. Similarly, the most recent Amnesty International report on
the "crackdown on online expression" in Saudi Arabia includes several
mentions of Twitter users but none of Wikipedians:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/02/saudi-arabia-alarming-crackd…
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Amnesty's report specifically mentions that a Twitter user
was
sentenced for supporting women's rights activist Loujain al-Hathloul but
fails to mention that one of the jailed Wikimedians uploaded Loujain
al-Hathloul's Commons picture, which is used in her Wikipedia articles.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I didn't find anything about Osama and Ziyad or, more
generally,
Wikimedians in Saudi Arabia on the website of the EFF.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> There is a mention of Osama and Ziyad and the fact that they
were Wikipedians on the PEN website:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
https://pen.org/report/freedom-to-write-index-2022/
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The U.S. State Department's 2022 country report on Saudi
Arabia,
published in March 2023, includes a mention of Osama's 32-year prison
sentence, but doesn't make clear that he was jailed for being a Wikipedian,
and Ziyad is not mentioned:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-country-reports-on-human-rights-practice…
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Will this be remedied in the U.S. State Department's 2023
country report? I think each country report covers the period up to October
of the preceding year, so this month will be the last chance to make sure
the 2023 report published next spring will include information on Osama and
Ziyad's prison sentences and their Wikipedia activity.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Andreas
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:09?PM The Cunctator <
cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Frankly, that's implausible.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023, 3:37 PM DerHexer via Wikimedia-l <
wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> I do think that posting any kind of response to these
questions on a public mailing list would do more harm than good. Thank you.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Best,
>>>> >>>> DerHexer
>>>> >>>> Wikimedia Steward
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Am Montag, 25. September 2023 um 21:20:21 MESZ hat
Andreas
Kolbe <jayen466(a)gmail.com> Folgendes geschrieben:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Dear all,
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> As there was a recent press mention of Osama and
Ziyad[1] (see
"In the Media" in the current Signpost issue) ? does the
WMF's Human Rights
Team (cc'ed) have any update on their situation?
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Has anyone else heard any news? If I recall correctly,
Osama
had married not long before being jailed in 2020 ? has anyone been in touch
with his wife?
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Is there anything the community can do?
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Andreas
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> [1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_imprisoned_for_editing_Wikiped…
>>>> >>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>> >>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list --
wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>> >>>> Public archives
at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
>>>> >>>> To unsubscribe
send an email to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> >>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>> >>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list --
wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>> >>>> Public archives
at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
>>>> >>>> To unsubscribe
send an email to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>> >>> Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
>>>> >>> To unsubscribe send
an email to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>> > Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
>>>> > To unsubscribe send an email
to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>> Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Maggie Dennis
>>> She/her/hers
>>> Vice President, Community Resilience & Sustainability
>>> Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>> Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
>
>
> --
> Lane Rasberry
> user:bluerasberry
> ?????
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To
unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at: