[WikiEN-l] Rules, expertise, and encyclopedic standards

Tue Mar 8 20:36:20 UTC 2005

--- Sj <2.718281828 at gmail.com> wrote:
> To provide specific context, consider journals such
> as "Infinite
> Energy", with a bimonthly distribution of
> 3000--5000, which are hard
> to distinguish in any quantitative fashion from
> 'reputable' journals. 
> However, this journal is devotes itself to
> publishing papers on free
> energy, cold fusion, an perpetual motion; and
> running headlines like
> "Einstein: Plagiarist of the Century."  I think many
> of us would agree
> that a paper does not become reputable, or any less
> original research,
> for being published in such a journal.
> 
> -- 
> +sj+

However, an article *about* the journal would be
encyclopedic.

RickK

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 