[WikiEN-l] Re: Notice to defendent in the case of arbitration

Sat Jan 24 08:19:56 UTC 2004

Dan, I *deeply* thank you for the mail you sent to apologize for writing 
as a non member (usually, people do not)

Do not forget to register soon :-)

anthere

Dan Drake a écrit:
> PMFBI again, but after following this case for a week or more, I don't 
> understand this.
> 
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:23:17 UTC, Fred Bauder 
> <fredbaud at ctelco.net> wrote:
> 
>>If he does I will revert it and protect the page.
>>
>>
>>From: Rick <giantsrick13 at yahoo.com>
>>
>>
>>He will just delete it as soon as it is posted to his Talk page.
>>
>>RickK
>>
>>Fred Bauder <fredbaud at ctelco.net> wrote:
>>A notice should be placed on Mr. Natural Health's talk page quoting the
>>complaint and linking to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration.
>>
> 
> 
> 
> So what if he deletes it? Bad behavior, but it's his talk page. The point 
> of posting the notice would seem to be to inform him of the fact that 
> arbitration is requested. When the notice goes up on his talk page, he's 
> informed. If he decides to ignore the notice, then I suppose there's a 
> procedure for handling that. If he claims he never got the notice -- well,
> gimme a break! What are archives for?
> 
> OTOH, if a disputant deletes the official public arbitration notice on the
> RFA page, then just ban his/her ass.  Naturally, the charge of vandalizing
> the RFA page is one he has to be allowed to defend himself against, but if
> that charge is established, you can forget all the other issues and all 
> those complexities and doubts and ambiguities and procedural 
> complications, and just ban his ass.
> 
> What am I missing here?