Your content will be deleted. There will be no backups. It's fine for
short-term projects.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 5:35 PM MJ Lemonsnout <MJL-wiki(a)outlook.com> wrote:
It has some problems, but I would recommend it. 😊
There is a lot of flexibility (especially with extensions). The only thing
I would be cautious of would be some of the other users who are active
there are currently banned from some or all of WMF projects.
Also, Wikis that go dormant for too long get deleted.
-MJL
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows
*From: *Željko Blaće <zblace(a)mi2.hr>
*Sent: *Monday, November 1, 2021 5:22 PM
*To: *Wikispore experimental project <wikispore(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
*Subject: *[Wikispore] Re:
miraheze.org
I am interested in what is the overall momentum of the ecosystem
compared to Wikimedia and dynamics of the community there compared to
EN Wikipedia or Wikidata?
I wanna both start recommending it (love the idea or smaller and
bolder version of Wikimedia) and use it (more licences and content
flexibility)...
Should I be cautious or alert of any specific differences? (aside from
obvious absence of WMF and presence of more 'trivial' fandom content
:-p )
Best Z. Blace
_______________________________________________
Wikispore mailing list -- wikispore(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wikispore-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikispore mailing list -- wikispore(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wikispore-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
--
Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266