Geocodes, ah yes, probably guilty there.
I read through the thing twice and clicked various links before deciding I
was going to have to ask what the connection was between Kinlochleven.jpg
and genocide. And yes I agree that the whole thing is a bit too Geocodey
and dry - if anyone fancies improving it dont worry about it being in
userspace. Oh and trust me, if you get a newbie who is nervous about
changing an article, asking them to choose which picture to use and getting
them to transform articles with pictures is very empowering.
There's also pretty much zero risk of newbies getting edit conflicts or
being bitten by patrollers.
On 9 March 2016 at 16:36, Katherine Bavage <katherine.bavage(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Typo! But, also, yes lets not train newbies to add
images of genocide :/
Anyway, lets head off a debate about how much genocide is too
much...thanks Jonathan, that's handy :)
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 at 16:34 Gordon Joly <gordon.joly(a)pobox.com> wrote:
On 09/03/16 16:32, Richard Symonds wrote:
I think that word is "geocode", rather
than genocide. But yes, if the
word was genocide, then yes, that would be too genocidey.
Are you sure?
Gordo
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk