On 1 July 2014 19:22, Andy Mabbett <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
On 1 July 2014 18:45, HJ Mitchell
<hjmitchell(a)ymail.com> wrote:
I agree that other projects should be
considered,
as useful background if nothing else
Quite.
but quibbling over details of the past isn't
going to
help the discussion move forward for the benefit
of the *future* of these projects.
I do not believe that reiterating my objection to past good work, by
me and others, being written out of the chapter's history is
"quibbling", much less "over details".
Hmm, I recall an earlier thread on this list which was pretty much devoted
to
contention over how the history of Wikipedians in residence got written.
This thread is intended to help a staff member do her job.
It would be a shame, certainly, if WiRs became one of those "don't bring
that up again" topics.
Charles