On 16/02/17 17:08, Lucy Crompton-Reid wrote:
In several cases this was because the editor concerned
didn't agree
with the decision, and so could potentially defend the process but not
the outcome.
A rather complex decision (to ban the Daily Mail) with a lot of history,
and some un-answered questions (e.g. why are other sources not on the
banned list?).
If WMUK had some warning, who would they want to put up? John Lubbock?
Gordo