This is all very interesting, but for all the emails, isn't actually addressing my
point.
Harry Mitchell
Phone: 024 7698 0977
Skype: harry_j_mitchell
________________________________
From: rexx <rexx(a)blueyonder.co.uk>
To: UK Wikimedia mailing list <wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Friday, 10 August 2012, 16:23
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Business cards
Which goes to show the unanticipated problem of electing trustees who know everything
about nuclear reactors and nothing about sheds.
It's not my fault my degree in theoretical physics was missing the cycling module :(
--
Rexx
On 10 August 2012 13:22, Michael Peel <michael.peel(a)wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
On 10 Aug 2012, at 12:10, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10 August 2012 12:06, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The problem, then, is Richard's wording in
his email. Recalling them
because of a mistake that was pointed out by a board member is
different from recalling them because a board member objected. Given
the way it was described, I think our reaction was entirely
understandable.
Still blatant bikeshedding, nevertheless.
Since we're on the topic, I regret to inform everyone that our nuclear reactor project
is significantly delayed due to disagreement about the design and deployment strategy of
the cooling rods, and there's a growing consensus to change direction completely and
go with wind turbines instead. In good news, though, I understand that lots of progress is
being made with the bike shed, although it's beyond my ken to understand all of the
details there...
Thanks,
Mike
(Sorry, I couldn't resist.)
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org