Jimmy already knows, although I don't know what (if any) action he
will take.
Just to confirm, I haven't been contacted by phone about this at all,
and am not aware that The Register has made any attempts at
communicating with WMUK. If they have, then perhaps they would have
avoided making embarrassing, elementary mistakes...
Mike Peel (personal view)
On 27 Apr 2009, at 16:39, Thomas Dalton wrote:
2009/4/27 James Hardy <wikimediauk(a)weeb.biz>iz>:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/27/wikipedia_charity_not/
Was only a matter of time. So nice of him to attempt to contact
the Board
for a comment, but since he got the name of the company wrong
twice in the
article he probably was unable to work out who to contact.
Someone should probably make Jimmy Wales aware of this article, he may
want to complain about his company and ours being conflated like
that... We should certainly complain about it. The board should write
to his editor pointing out the errors.
I'm also interested in his sub-headline, "Decision unlikely to be
amended". Is that just his personal opinion? I haven't seen anyone
else make such a statement and it is odd to use your own opinions as
sub-headlines...
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org