On 26 July 2012 17:21, Peter Cohen <peterc(a)cix.compulink.co.uk> wrote:
Unfortunately the WCA did not do so when electing its
chair. Fae failed to
warn those present that he was the subject of an Arbcom case which had
reached its proposed decision stage that already had substantial support
for a number of motions critical of him. The ban proposal didn't yet exist
but any Signpost article on the WCA meeting would still have been likely
to have been overshadowed by the case.
By allowing Fae to go ahead in having himself put forward as chair of the
WCA, the Chief Executive and Trustees of WMUK have already scored an own
goal as far as future relations with other Chapters are concerned.
That is prior to the resolution of the arbcom case and thus of
decidedly secondary significance to the problem that WMUK is now
presented with.
--
geni