I might be mistaken, but doesn't the "-SA" in "CC-BY-SA" require
mentioning the license?
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I don't see a problem. They've attributed it
both to the actual user
and to Wikimedia (I would have preferred Wikimedia Commons, but close
enough). What more do you want? I'm not aware of any requirement to
link to Commons.
On 12 April 2011 09:02, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
The BBC has published a timeline article about
Fukushima:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13017282
At the end of the article is a schematic drawing of a boiling water reactor.
The image contains "Source: RobbyBer/Wikimedia". Not as text, mind
you, just part of the GIF.
No link to Commons.
The images on Commons that look similar and are based on RobbyBer's
work (e.g. [1]) are all GFDL/CC-BY-SA.
Looks like someone tried, probably whoever edited the SVG, but was
ignored somewhere down the line...
Yes, there's many images "just taken" from Wiki(m|p)edia on the web,
but this one is rather prominent. Maybe someone should write the BBC a
friendly mail, reminding them that "IP piracy" will get them into
Gitmo these days ;-)
Cheers,
Magnus
[1]
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/File:Schema_siedewasser…
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org