geni wrote:
2008/9/8 Ross Gardler
<ross.gardler(a)oucs.ox.ac.uk>uk>:
I'm not objecting to these decisions
themselves (I came too late to be
part of them).
Good. Because if we had followed your methods they would probably not
yet have been made.
Sorry, I don't understand.
The methods I describe are in use in a large number of highly succesful
communities and, according to a previous mail from Thomas to be
identical to the one (informally) used to reach the current proposal,
i.e. lazy consensus.
Am I missing something or is this merely a lack of clarity in what I was
saying.
You also proposed voting on things - that's the part that wouldn't be practical.