The latter - although there's more nuances than that. E.g. even if someone volunteered
to bank cheques (which can happen - I used to do that several years back), it's still
better for staff to do it for accountability reasons. The full description is at:
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Volunteer_Policy
Thanks,
Mike
On 1 Apr 2012, at 12:38, WereSpielChequers wrote:
"WMUK may not take on a task that volunteer could
do". or "WMUK may not take on a task that volunteer is willing and able to do as
a volunteer?"
Hopefully the tasks being done by our staff are ones that volunteers could do, but nobody
is volunteering to bank cheques and so forth.
This may seem like a subtle difference, but you wouldn't want a professional staff
that preferred to employ people to do things that they didn't think the mere
volunteers were capable of. Not that I'm accusing anyone in WMUK of falling into that
trap.
WSC
On 1 April 2012 11:50, Gordon Joly <gordon.joly(a)pobox.com> wrote:
On 01/04/2012 02:20, Anthony (AGK) wrote:
Should WMUK not be involved in developing a Wikimania bid? (I don't
follow WM governance very closely, and may misunderstand that aspect
of the Chapter's purpose.)
Job demarcation. WMUK may not take on a task that volunteer could do.
Gordo
--
Gordon Joly
gordon.joly(a)pobox.com
http://www.joly.org.uk/
Don't Leave Space To The Professionals!
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org