On 10 Aug 2012, at 12:10, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10 August 2012 12:06, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The problem, then, is Richard's wording in
his email. Recalling them
because of a mistake that was pointed out by a board member is
different from recalling them because a board member objected. Given
the way it was described, I think our reaction was entirely
understandable.
Still blatant bikeshedding, nevertheless.
Since we're on the topic, I regret to inform everyone that our nuclear reactor project
is significantly delayed due to disagreement about the design and deployment strategy of
the cooling rods, and there's a growing consensus to change direction completely and
go with wind turbines instead. In good news, though, I understand that lots of progress is
being made with the bike shed, although it's beyond my ken to understand all of the
details there...
Thanks,
Mike
(Sorry, I couldn't resist.)