Hi Andy,
That rationale makes sense, unless the image was of something more permanent, or of
something that's still there with no expectations of being removed? Is there an enwp
article here?
Thanks,
Mike
On 17 Feb 2014, at 20:42, Andy Mabbett <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
Photographers active in the UK may be interested in
this successful
deletion proposal:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Horse_at_…
made on the basis that "the sculpture was not permanent, but
temporary. It was commissioned for Daylesford in Gloucestershire, but
at first stood in 2009 temporarily in London. There is no freedom of
panorama in England for temporary sculptures and therefore the license
is invalid."
I intend to call for undeletion.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk 