I sympathize with the many, many hours spent; the "terrific" from me was
mostly that I anticipated one more very long night (personally) and not
much time for the community to review/discuss/refine, which we'll now have
more of a chance to do.
Have a good (better? :) weekend-
Luis
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Michael Maggs <Michael(a)maggs.name> wrote:
Thanks for the update. Not sure how
"terrific" I find that news,
personally, given that I have spent around 20 hours over the last two days
working to meet the original deadline!
Best regards
Michael
____________
Michael Maggs
Chair, Wikimedia UK
On 31 Jan 2014, at 23:10, Luis Villa <lvilla(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
That's terrific to hear!
As an update on my end, I've done up to question 71, so this gives us a
little more time to review and flesh those out.
[For what it is worth, Michael, looking at the page here shows:
From *05.12.2013* to *05.03.2014 (deadline extended)*.
]
Luis
_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810
NOTICE: *This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you
have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the
mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical
reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community
members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.*