I would be happy to take this forward. Best, Lucy
On 8 July 2016 at 11:17, とある白い猫 <to.aru.shiroi.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Indeed, that would be a good start as a pilot project.
Does anyone from
WMUK have contacts with the Parliament?
-- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko)
On 8 July 2016 at 07:18, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com
wrote:
On 08 July 2016 at 01:51 とある白い猫 <to.aru.shiroi.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
It can be argued that the current copyright obfuscates the general
public's access to the report. I feel it is in the public's best interest
to have this monolith of documentation on a more user friendly venue such
as Wikisource where it can be more manageable and digestible.
While I'm in sympathy with the aim (I even have the Scott Report on my
shelves, which is not "digested") my immediate thought is that the
Executive Summary should be used as a pilot project, if anything is
actually to happen.
Charles
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk
--
Lucy Crompton-Reid
Chief Executive
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 207 065 0991
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The
Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate
Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent
non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility
for its contents.*