My understanding is that SecurePoll can handle the type of vote we're
dealing with, but I'll certainly double-check based on your comments.
Thanks for the heads-up.
___________________
philippe
philippe.wiki(a)gmail.com
Administrator, OTRS Volunteer
[[en:User:Philippe]]
On May 27, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Robert Rohde wrote:
Have you discussed software requirements with
developers?
I'm not sure the new SecurePoll software is yet set up to allow for
preferential voting (either on the input side or the tallying side).
Also, we had a number of problems with tallying [1]. Some of which
was a result of essentially overloading the software with 17000 votes,
but even if you avoid that issue (for example by having stricter
suffrage requirements), there are still some things to look out for.
Which reminds me that I still need to go file some Bug reports...
August is plenty of lead time to address these issues, but they
shouldn't be kept to the last minute.
-Robert Rohde
[1]
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/licom-l/2009-May/000245.html
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l