The Tribune link (
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2000/20001107/cth2.htm|accessdate=5%20April%202…)
was wrong, it needs the extension deleted. I note that there is another
unreachable or unlisted reference - [7] - which needs updating.
On 8 Jan 2014 11:03, "Mahitgar from Marathi Wikipedia"
<mahitgar(a)yahoo.co.in>
wrote:
The problem is with Indian Media and newspaper
industry.Earlier times
Cheif editors and Subeditors used to insist and guide for crossconfirmation
of the information being collected and that is part and parcle of
journalists primary responsibility.
As far as Mahitgar's comment is concerned, I am not sure why any of us
should lose any sleep over the practices or standards of newspapers :-)
No doubt even wiki editors can make mistakes but atleast on wiki one can
make corrections.How one will make corrections in newspaper report ? If
journalist of a news paper has made a mistake,people need to ask the media
editors first.Wikipedia is just a seondary source of info.As much a
journalist has made a mistake , it is equally mistaken to blame internet
and wikipedia blindly.I suppose.
Why are we discussing this 'in the air'? It should just have been corrected
right away. If the opportunity (ie Internet access) was available, it could
have been corrected right in front of her. What better way to demonstrate
the participatory power of the world's best and most accessible source of
information to a sceptic? I think that this lady, or some of her students,
might have become Wikipedians themselves!
Once I read the original Tribune report, the reason for the error became
obvious. The original English is poor usage and could be misinterpreted,
which is clearly what happened in this case: [She belongs to the well-known
family of Kolhapur, which apart from its sugar mills, is also famous for
its sweet music.] actually means that Kolhapur is famous for sugar mills
and sweet music). Please let us assign blame where blame lies, or else hold
our peace (always the better option).
On Wednesday, 8 January 2014 6:06 AM, jayant kirtane <
j_kirtane(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I met Smt Shruti Sadolikar, musician, in the Music Department
of Mumbai University located in the rear of Churchgate station. In a
discussion with PhD students, a question was raised regarding the
reliability of citing internet references. Some of us gave examples about
how Wikipedia was used all over the world for all kinds of reasons. Smt
Sadolikar, who was present, gave an instance of wrong information in
Wikipedia:
"Sadolikar was born 1951 into a family from
Kolhapur<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolhapur> which
was known for its musical tradition and owning sugar
mills<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugar_refinery>
.[3]
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shruti_Sadolikar#cite_note-Rough-3>[4]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shruti_Sadolikar#cite_note-TI-4>
" in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shruti_Sadolikar. She said that "a
hundred people" had mentioned the bit about owning sugar mills. This was
factually incorrect, and gave the wrong impression that she came from an
affluent family.
Now [4] is a newspaper article: Tandon, Aditi, "Three days of rich
musical treat", The Tribune, 6 November 2000. I looked up the source, and
sure enough, it mentions the sugar mills. So it seems that whoever wrote
the article merely repeated a factual error in the source (which has been
properly cited as [4] ).
Smt Sadolikar's father and guru was a musician, Marathi stage artist,
music director, etc. His Wikipedia entry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wamanrao_Sadolikar makes no mention of sugar
mills.
Smt Sadolikar had a point to make: if Wikipedia is to put information
about her in the public domain, is it not their responsibility to inform
her about it and confirm that the information is factual? Some of us had
said that Wikipedia was not organized along the principles of, say, a
newspaper, but if a factual error was brought to its notice, it would be
corrected. In that spirit I am sending this mail to your mailing list.
Like the rest of the world I am a grateful user and great fan of
Wikipedia.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-mum mailing list
Wikimedia-in-mum(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-mum
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-in-mum mailing list
Wikimedia-in-mum(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-mum