Hold on. As much as I love the idea of abusing this little chapter to host
un-foundation things... aren't we starting to stretch this a little far? If
we start hosting projects that are in no way related to the foundation (I'd
accept something like translatewiki as being "related", to use as an
example), this really is no longer wikimedia chapter.
I'm not saying I'm against the idea per say... but... lets try to stick to
stick to our designated scope.
-Jon
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 04:24, James Salsman <jsalsman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sabahat,
Of course the Wikipedia Chapter should become as skilled as possible at
creating mirrors from dumps, which too few people know how to do (because
it's so poorly documented) but I don't know whether anyone would expect to
host projects. Provisioning, testing, and loading mirrors on hardware is
the only emperically accurate way to benchmark it. The Foundation is too
overloaded to effectively deal with the marketing barrage associated with
exploring new implementations of Mediawiki services, so that's clearly a way
to help even if we don't leave entire forks up for more than a few months
at a time.
Do you think there are projects we should host that the Foundation is
unlikely to host?
The digital divide is a symptom of income inequality, and I'm not sure what
a Chapter could do to counter that kind of institutional bias. Should we
add specific economic principles to the Values?
Regards,
James Salsman
On May 5, 2010 4:05 AM, "Sabahat Ashraf/"iFaqeer <ashrafs(a)alum.rpi.edu>
wrote:
Does "implementing software and hardware systems...and holding events"
cover projects? You know, members helping deploy, populate,
administrate and manage wikis in and of the public interest?
I guess I ask because I have spent much of my professional career as a
writer/content producer for the tech industry and them folks usually
don't consider content as part of software...
Apologies if this is a newbie question that has been addressed and put
to rest in the evolution of the text we're adopting.
On the Values side, I would just advocate a more front-and-center
place for a conscious effort to overcome what we call "Institutional
Bias", but really is just gaps in information and perspectives
(imbalance in content and opinions, if you will) that are the result
of things like the digital divide and uneven access and contribution
to media, both old and new. Heaven knows that's one of strongest
motivations for my contribution to the Wikipedia and other projects.
California seems like the ideal place home for efforts in that regard.
My tuppence 'orth,
Sabahat ('iFaqeer" on Wikimedia projects I am part of)
---
Sabahat I Ashraf ("iFaqeer")
iFaqeer @ Gmail/Gtalk, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, .com
darwaish @ yahoo
415 881 7834
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 3:18 AM, James Salsman <jsalsman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Proposal:
The mis...
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-california mailing list
Wikimedia-california(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-california
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-california mailing list
Wikimedia-california(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-california