Copied from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Violence_against_Israelis#Lists
(posted here so I don't have to repeat myself five
times) I dispute the factual accuracy of the various
terrorism against Israel in {year} pages because
sources for the reports therein are (apart from the
word of a single Wikipedian) fragmentary or
non-existent. I will happily withdraw the accuracy
disputes when each item on each list is annotated
properly. �No-One Jones 10:37, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Mirv has added the "factually disputed" tag to this
set of articles without disputing any individual item.
Are we to annotate each item in each article to meet
this criteria? Are we to apply this level of citation
to a set of articles? Is this level of citation to
apply to Violence against Israelis alone?
I would like the disputed tags remove till a factually
inaccuracy is found. At that point I would like the
inaccuracy corrected, so that the tag would not apply.
Lance6Wins
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now.
http://messenger.yahoo.com