On 12/16/05, Dirk Riehle <dirk(a)riehle.org> wrote:
At 16.12.2005, Andrea Forte wrote:
>I find it problematic to use number of edits and number of authors
>(quantitative date) as indicators of content quality.
...
...You would want
to show that some quantitative measures like number of edits
correlate positively with quality.
...
I would argue that you can assess article quality only
by human
measure.
...
I think all attempts at reputation systems etc will
fail if they are
purely algorithmical.
Well, then we all agree. When do we start? :)