--- On Tue 09/02, Magnus Manske < magnus.manske(a)web.de > wrote:
"Daniel Mayer wrote: No separate project needed (a sub-project of Wikibooks might be
needed though)."
There's no such thing as a sub-project, at least not on the software level. Either it
is one project, or two. Two projects could be accessing the same database, but I don't
see a reason for that, as we'd have two interfaces to show and do exactly the same
thing. Two projects could be *presented* as project and subproject, though. If we call the
two projects
wikibooks.org and
wikisources.org, or rather
textbooks.wikibooks.org and
sources.wikibooks.org, doesn't make a difference, at least not to me.
_______________________________________________
I didn't read Daniel's the same way you did. I assumed his 'sub project'
referred to a kind of effort like the countrty or biography template
''projects'' within Wikipedia. If you look at his comments that way they
make a lot more sense. A common wiki, data store, and set of software techniques that
support a variety of books with somewhat different natures.
Oh. Yes. I see. Now.
In that case, my earlier objections still apply, but as I said, I won't
block any emerging consensus on that :-)
Magnus