From: Robert Horning
<robert_horning(a)netzero.net>
I apologize that I haven't been up on this discussion, as my computer
(and hard drive, etc.) crashed to a completely unrecoverable state over
the past couple of weeks.
My heart goes out to you, I've suffered the same in the past. Nothing ruins
your agenda like a complete computer failure.
... The reasons for using the content
must by its nature be very much restricted. At the same time, I think
there is room for some limited fair-use images within Wikibooks.
The issue always seems to come back to one of heavy restrictions on fair use
to the point that all images tagged as "fair use" should be viewed with
absolute scrutiny. There are few instances where fair use are "required",
and plenty of opportunity for people to abuse fair use, or misuse it out of
ignorance, and those misuses can be dangerous for our project. I've made my
opinion on this known, and I won't continue to kick this poor horse any
further.
What I envision (a vision that is likely not to gather much support) is the
uploading of all images (or nearly all images) to commons, and almost
banning outright image uploads to our server. This serves a variety of
purposes. Foremost is that commons is staffed by more people who are
knowledgeable and proficient at dealing with images and copyright licensing.
The few fair use images that don't qualify at commons could be uploaded to
wikibooks, and those select few could be examined through the proper lenses.
I am not trying to start a discussion on this issue here, i'm just trying to
draw a complete portrait of my intent.
I do want to hear what the WMF has to say officially about fair use (it was
mentioned that they had a statement on it "forthcoming") before we start
making any radical alterations to our policy pages.
--Andrew Whitworth
_________________________________________________________________
Refi Now: Rates near 39yr lows! $430,000 Mortgage for $1,399/mo - Calculate
new payment
http://www.lowermybills.com/lre/index.jsp?sourceid=lmb-9632-17727&moid=…