Hínandil wrote:
Sy wrote:
On Thu,
2005-09-01 at 15:11 -0700, Hínandil wrote:
Am I missing something, or shouldn't he just
create a group "authors"
and add all the authors into that group, and non-authors (normal
logged
in users) can't edit?
But it wouldn't solve the problem if different authors of different
groups shouldn't edit oneanothers work. =/
Not to be trite, but it sounds like what you *really* need is a
content management system, which has lots of great, useful controls,
and not a wiki, which has no such controls. Unless things have
greatly improved since January when I was researching things,
MediaWiki's the only wiki engine with a mature sense of "users" much
less permissions.
I humbly suggest that if you can't trust each group not to vandalize
others' pages, then it might be a better investment of your time to
research CMS solutions (there are some very nice Free, open source
ones out there) than to try and hack around with MediaWiki which is
opposed to what you want by design.
Hínandil
_______
Thanks for all your answers.
It's true that if we choose a very locked system, maybe we should use
another solution ... But in fact, the discussion is not close so we'll
see. In my opinion, we should set the system with 2 groups like someone
told, and let authors edit pages, anonymous wouldn't be allowed, and
just explain to people hat we prefer that only the authors from the
group to edit.
julien
________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
MediaWiki-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l