Well, at least this confirms that there are a 14
photos of dudes getting
their *own* rocks off on Commons! Thank god! (Oh...speaking of
permissions...)
You also have to scroll down a bit in Google search before you come
across the article after searching "sucking your own cock". The fact that
the search finds that page based on one of my favorite films, Clerks, is
rather funny.
Wait, where is Sue a liar?
-Sarah
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Béria Lima <beria.lima(a)wikimedia.pt>wrote;wrote:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2011-September/069078.html
_____
*Béria Lima*
Wikimedia Portugal <http://wikimedia.pt>
(351) 963 953 042
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que
estamos a fazer.*
On 30 September 2011 00:37, Ryan Kaldari <rkaldari(a)wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
> **
> Would you like to elaborate?
>
> Ryan Kaldari
>
>
> On 9/29/11 4:35 PM, Béria Lima wrote:
>
> I think it works both ways: There you might get stomped on by people
> who disagree with the lies Sue told in the post, and here I will be stomp up
> for even mentioned that she did lied in that blog post.
>
> Safe environment do not exist in this case. Is safeR for supports to
> come here, and safeR for opposers to go there. That does not make any list
> safe, only shows that the POV here is different than the POV there.
> _____
> *Béria Lima*
> Wikimedia Portugal <http://wikimedia.pt>
> (351) 963 953 042
>
> *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
> livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que
> estamos a fazer.*
>
>
> On 30 September 2011 00:25, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stierch(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
>
>> I'm sure there are some people on this mailing list who also disagree
>> as well! We try to provide a safe haven for discussion about sensitive
>> topics.
>>
>> But, if any of us spoke up on Foundation-L we'd be risking getting
>> torn up by often heavily opinionated Foundation-L subscribers, and it gets
>> really tiring :( It is also nice to have a change in opinion - for those who
>> dislike the post, there are also many of that support it. Thanks for
>> bringing up that a different type of conversation is taking place on
>> Foundation-L! I've been following it.
>>
>> -Sarah
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Béria Lima
<beria.lima(a)wikimedia.pt>wrote;wrote:
>>
>>> ehhh, sorry for be the different, but you people are reading the
>>> thread about that same blog post in Foundation-l ? The opinions there seems
>>> to be quite different than yours.
>>> _____
>>> *Béria Lima*
>>> Wikimedia Portugal <http://wikimedia.pt>
>>> (351) 963 953 042
>>>
>>> *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de
>>> ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que
>>> estamos a fazer.*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30 September 2011 00:09, Ryan Kaldari
<rkaldari(a)wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can I nominate Sue for the Executive Director's Barnstar? :)
>>>>
>>>> Kaldari
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/29/11 4:06 PM, Amory wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I normally hate +1s, but I would like to echo this. Really
>>>> exceptionally well crafted, and even for people following it's a very
good
>>>> writeup. Thank you, Sue.
>>>>
>>>> ~A
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:36, Andreas Kolbe
<jayen466(a)yahoo.com>wrote;wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the link Sarah. It's an outstanding post by Sue,
and
>>>>> a courageous one, too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --- On *Thu, 29/9/11, Sarah Stierch
<sarah.stierch(a)gmail.com>*wrote*wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Sarah Stierch <sarah.stierch(a)gmail.com>
>>>>> Subject: [Gendergap] Sue's new blog
>>>>> To: "Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects"
<
>>>>> gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
>>>>> Date: Thursday, 29 September, 2011, 7:47
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://suegardner.org/2011/09/28/on-editorial-judgment-and-empathy/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A lot of things I think about, and I'm sure a lot of other
people
>>>>> here think about.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure this blog won't be well received on other
WMF-related
>>>>> mailing lists, but, I have to admit - for me - I feel like she's
speaking
>>>>> for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't want to be a censor, I just want people to have common
>>>>> sense, good judgement, customer service and logic. And when people
call
>>>>> *me* a censor, it's just as offensive as the other names I've
been
>>>>> called.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have beencalled a prude, bitch, agitator, bore, conservative,
>>>>> censor, "anti-woman"... someone with an agenda...etc. I can
only thank you
>>>>> Sue for speaking on behalf of me - when I clumsily try to express
myself on
>>>>> Foundation-L and fear being shot-down and having my "Wiki"
self-esteem torn
>>>>> down.....I just feel like "giving up."
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks. And I promise everyone, some of us are working towards
>>>>> this, and working towards a change and a towards a conversation that
is
>>>>> adult, logical and respectful.
>>>>>
>>>>> <3
>>>>>
>>>>> -Sarah
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for
Wikimedia<http://www.glamwiki.org>
>>>>> Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Art<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch>
>>>>> and
>>>>> Sarah Stierch Consulting
>>>>> *Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.*
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
http://www.sarahstierch.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>>>>
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org<http://mc/compose?to=Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org>
>>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>>>> Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gendergap mailing
listGendergap@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>>> Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>> Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia<http://www.glamwiki.org>
>> Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Art<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch>
>> and
>> Sarah Stierch Consulting
>> *Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.*
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>
http://www.sarahstierch.com/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing
listGendergap@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia <http://www.glamwiki.org>
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.*
------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org