Stub tags are notoriously bad for this (I've just rerated half a dozen
of these; Toby, are you happy for me to update the list?)
On the other hand, we can take away a somewhat positive message from
this as well:
Two articles are FA and 6 are GA/equivalent. Across enwiki as a whole,
approximately 0.6% of articles are FA or GA class. So this subset of
articles is perhaps ten times better than the average...
Andrew.
On 16 June 2014 15:06, Risker <risker.wp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
While I will agree that many of those articles could
use significant
improvement, I wouldn't take the assessments all that seriously; a lot of
those articles have not been assessed in many years, despite intervening
improvements.
Risker
On 16 June 2014 08:58, Toby Hudson <tobyyy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I've just wikified this in my userspace if anyone wants to quickly check
out our articles on these women. The good news is that we have an article
for each of them. The bad news is that article quality is pretty grim if
these are truly the 100 most powerful women.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:99of9/100powerwomen
Toby/99of9
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Risker <risker.wp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is a pretty impressive showing for someone just 4 weeks into the
job: being named to the Forbes list of the 100 most powerful women:
http://www.forbes.com/profile/lila-tretikov/
Note that increasing diversity is, according to the brief article, a top
priority.
Risker/Anne
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk