On 2/27/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 27/02/07, Gregory Maxwell
<gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It's also the case that GFDL + CC-by-nc-nd is
generally considered to
be a sign of license confusion.
Yeah. I'm talking about some stuff that's already CC-by-nc-nd. Quote:
"Oh, it should be fine, it's all Creative Commons!" Thus proving
Stallman right. Gah. I'm hoping getting them to GFDL it as well will
sound good to them.
Perhaps I'll make up a custom tag ...
It's a constant problem for us. :(
And the offence.. "I already gave it to you with the CreativeCommons
license, what more do you greedy vultures want?!" ;)
If only someone close to Wikimedia were on the Creative Commons Board
(
http://creativecommons.org/about/people) so that we'd have a way to
encourage them to stop Creating Confusion.... ;)