I don't mean to be a killjoy, but taking the example of the image by David
Monniaux, for instance, and licence compliance nonwistanding, doesn't
"courtesy of Wikimedia Commons"
make us a more efficient publicity than
"GFDL" ?
there might be some food for though in the fact that we are requesting a
lower profile, in practice. Should we encourage people to
* Put proper EXIFs
* double-licence their images under a Free CC licence
* put an example of proper credits including a mention of Commons (like
"(c)Rama / Wikimedia Commons, Cc-by-sa) below all images ?
-- Rama
On Dec 23, 2007 1:08 PM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 23/12/2007, Brianna Laugher
<brianna.laugher(a)gmail.com> wrote:
DMCA takedown notice seems overkill. Geez, we
already provide free
content, is it so hard to fulfill the license conditions? I just want
to poke them and say "improve your credit-giving regime".
Oh yeah, do that first ;-) Always seek compliance first!
- d.
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l