On 5/28/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 28/05/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
GPL v3 has nothing whatsoever to do with the GFDL.
- d.
Not actually true (some ideas are being Incorporated or at least
people are thinking about doing so). But in any case I didn't link to
a copy of GPL v3. I linked to a copy of "SFDLv1: First discussion
draft"
Comments invited here:
http://gplv3.fsf.org/comments/gsfdl-draft-1.html#1849:
(from our POV " E. Preserve all the copyright notices of the Work."
needs modifying since it creates problems with image watermarks.)
There is talk of a future GPL being suitable for things other than
programs but not the GPL 3.0
--
geni