[WikiEN-l] Oversight log

Thu Jun 22 08:52:18 UTC 2006

On 6/22/06, stevertigo <vertigosteve at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> What people seem to disagree with is with the notion
> that the log "has to be kept private" due to someone's
> claim of 'legally problematic revisions.' Is Google
> facilitating the "damage of Starbucks' reputation" by
> not removing "consumer whore" from its Image searches?

That might be an appropriate stance towards potentially libellous
revisions that are hidden, but from random sampling of the old log,
most of the revisions hidden so far seem to have been hidden because
they contain personal information, which I'm sure we all want to keep
hidden.

-- 
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain at gmail.com