[WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 6/4/06, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/5/06, George Herbert <george.herbert at gmail.com> wrote:
> > My objection in short: "Fuck process" is, here and now, more of a
> problem
> > for Wikipedia than any of the individual wrongs Tony has righted using
> that
> > justification, of late.
>
> That obviously isn't even remotely true.  Look at the latest RfC:
> people who object to *refactoring a talk page* because the aim is to
> remove useless and intrusive formatting.  I'd say "fuck process" here
> because, really, process is simply being used as an obstacle to the
> simple act of improving the editing environment by removing useless
> crap.



It is never good to piss people off.

That you feel that you have to do so is a stunning indictment of your
current attitude problem.


-- 
-george william herbert
gherbert at retro.com / george.herbert at gmail.com

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] cancelation of the deletion review of the satanism userbox
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]