[WikiEN-l] Verbose results from the Britannica vs. Wikipedia paper on nature.com

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] RefBot blocked by Admin with no email
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Larvatus [rape allegations)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 22 Dec 2005 at 19:18, Mathias Schindler <neubau at presroi.de> wrote:

> on http://fftw.org/~stevenj/Nature-reviews.doc, there is now a Microsoft 
> Word document describing the "errors" (in a broader sense) found by the 
> reviewing persons.

Yuck... proprietary Microsoft formats suck.  Why couldn't this have 
been done in a more standard, less proprietary form like ASCII or 
HTML?

-- 
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] RefBot blocked by Admin with no email
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Larvatus [rape allegations)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]