[WikiEN-l] Re: [Wikipedia-l] Re: Eric's abuse of his sysop powers

Tue Oct 21 10:27:23 UTC 2003

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Louis Kyu Won Ryu wrote:

> > Not so. NPOV requires balence in content. The critique in such detail
> > clearly violated wikipedia's NPOV policy. It doesn't matter if it was
> > 70% glorification or 70% demonisation of MT or anyone else. Making an
> > article overwhelmingly one sided where the vast majority of the text is
> > putting forward one view  [...]
>
> JT, Eric, everyone, this doesn't belong here; please see my comments on
> the talk page for the Mother Teresa article.  I suggest that the
> discussion be continued there, as I note in those comments.

Yes, just put it back on the page. What about the basic question of whether
Wikipedia should be NPOV, and how we do that? Maybe we should finally stop
circumventing that question and actually discuss it. Would be useful, I'd
say.

Andre Engels