[Foundation-l] Reporting & communicatio

Sat Jul 29 22:29:26 UTC 2006

Aphaia wrote:
> On 7/29/06, Anthere <Anthere9 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>>Domas Mituzas wrote:
>>
>>>>So we expect you remember other present and important issues clearly,
>>>>including the informally proposed Houserule for Wikimania?
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm rebellious, surely not following that one. :)
>>
>>I missed a step. What is this Houserule ?
> 
> 
> ah it's a joke. Danny proposed "R35 for alchol" and  certain people
> like our Lithuanian friend don't like it.
> 
> 
>>As for hardware purchase reports, they have never been as clear as
>>today, since precise purchases are detailed and voted in a resolution.
>>They may all be found on the wikimediafoundation site. Now, just a
>>thought : if you are a visitor not familiar with this website, I wish
>>you good luck to find the resolutions :-) They are very much hidden. It
>>would be nice that someone helps to make them more visible. Perhaps even
>>putting a [[resolutions]] link in the toolbar.
> 
> 
> Toolbar is one of improvement needed things definitely. It can be
> optimized through MediaWiki:Sidebar only for sysop.

Why do I feel...

Okay, remind me of that issue after Wikimania please :-)

> Other potential addition is "policies" -> Privacy policy & Visual
> guideline. The latter is hardly found too, I'm afraid.
> 
> It is fine to know the Board gets reports steadly. As the nect step,
> would the Board be interested in re-releasing some of those reports to
> the Foundation wiki or passing to Comcom as potential materials to the
> foundation wiki? Since 1) it is suggested some of those reports might
> contain things not suitable to be in public, 2) those reports haven't
> been passed to Comcom [even by itself, IIRC]. I think we are rather
> better to bother the Board in this area.

okay. I'll see what we can do. Ant

> Delphine permitted me to reuse her reports on early summer European
> tour as report from Chapter Com (see my meta talk), but it would be
> nicer much newer stuffs could be published.
> 
> 
>>We got one or two reports of the trademark committee. For obvious
>>reasons, our strategy with regards to brand is not openly published.
> 
> 