[Foundation-l] Re: [Wikipedia-l] MediaWiki 1.3
Andre Engels
engelsAG at t-online.de
Sat May 22 08:57:00 UTC 2004
"Ulrich Fuchs" <mail at ulrich-fuchs.de> schrieb:
> Well actually, unless the supercategories don't display the articles of there
> subcategories they are pretty useless. Eg
> http://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Canine should display [[Poodle]]
> somewhere, since Poodle is in the Dog category. Actually, this functionality
> is what we need the categories for ("show me all actors", "show me all
> artists", "show me all persons"). Without that working, I wouldn't call the
> category feature "functional".
I disagree. It is not functioning the way you want it, but:
* It _is_ functioning - it is only the sub-categorization that is not
* I don't even know whether I _want_ it to function the way you say.
Non-transparent subcategories provide a way to subdivide categories
that are getting unwieldily large. Weighing this against the possibility
of having a single category page that refers to all titles, I am not
sure yet which I find the greater advantage.
As another issue, the text 'category' for referring to a category, is
it the same on other languages, is it coupled to the name of the
category-namespace or is it separately defineable?
Andre Engels
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list