On 6/2/06, Elliott F. Cable <ecable(a)avxw.com> wrote:
I am thinking what it looks like we need is two
special pages -
because the 'wantedness' of the page, and the number of pages it
shows up as a red link on, are two totally different things. For this
new special page, I would recommend only counting templates once; and
only counting stuff in the main namespace. Or at least, NOT in the
talk namespace.
Sounds good. Dunno if it's still the case, but asteroids known only by
a 6 digit number always showed up high on the "most wanted" pages
previously, due to other asteroid articles linking to them or
something. There is lots of information that Wikipedia really badly
links, but detailed info on obscure asteroids probably isn't it...
Steve