On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 20:52:24 +0100, Tomasz Wegrzanowski
<taw(a)users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 07:29:52AM +1200, Richard
Grevers wrote:
Abbr has always been regarded as structural
markup and thus has survived
through unto
XHTML 1.1 strict. Yet ironically, deprecated presentational stuff like
<b> is supported.
A Wiki equivalent of <abbr> is needed then (and <acronym>, presumably.
Why do we need it ?
First, they're silly and were never widely used.
Second, what's wrong with [[jezyk angielski|ang.]] ?
come to think of it that does pop a title, doesn't it. Are there situations
where you might need to expand an abbreviation without it being a wiki-
link?
--
Richard Grevers